Skip to main content

Security report for tinaprimum.lv

Tina Primum · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tina Primum is a Latvian retail company specializing in women's fashion, offering a variety of clothing items such as dresses, jackets, raincoats, eco linen, pants, and accessories. The company operates both online and through physical branches, targeting women interested in fashion within Latvia. The website is multilingual, supporting Latvian, Russian, and English languages, and provides standard e-commerce features including a shopping cart and product catalog. Technically, the website uses JavaScript with Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking user interactions. The site appears to have moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. However, there is no explicit evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic but functional. The website includes a cookie consent banner indicating awareness of privacy regulations. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and explicit HTTPS confirmation in the provided data, which lowers its security posture. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The absence of exposed sensitive data is positive, but improvements are recommended to enhance security and compliance. Overall, the website is functional and professional with moderate trustworthiness. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits prevents full domain legitimacy verification, but the site shows no signs of malicious activity. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing security policies, and improving mobile and accessibility features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tinaprimum.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tina Primum operates as a small retail business focused on women's fashion in Latvia. Its business model combines e-commerce with physical retail locations, catering primarily to local customers. The company maintains an active social media presence across major platforms, supporting brand visibility and customer engagement. The website content and structure suggest a stable market position within the local fashion retail sector. Revenue streams likely derive from direct product sales online and in-store. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information limits deeper business intelligence insights. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with some positive indicators such as cookie consent implementation and absence of visible vulnerabilities in the HTML content. However, critical security features like HTTPS confirmation, security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.), and explicit security or incident response policies are missing or not detectable. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance beyond cookie consent, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The lack of contact emails or phone numbers for security or abuse reporting reduces incident response readiness. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvement to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures accessible from the website.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tina Primum
Description
Tina Primum is a Latvian retail business specializing in women's fashion collections including dresses, jackets, raincoats, eco linen, pants, and accessories. The website offers product catalogues, shopping guides, delivery information, and contact details.
Key services
Fashion product sales, Online shopping, Physical store locations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  3. Website uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  6. Social media links to Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest present
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response information found
  9. Website content is in Latvian with language switcher for Russian and English
  10. Site offers e-commerce functionality with shopping cart and product catalog
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard HTML and JavaScript with external scripts from Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. There is no indication of a CMS or modern web frameworks. The site includes a multilingual language switcher and basic e-commerce features such as a shopping cart and product catalog. Performance appears moderate with some image slideshows and dynamic content. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The lack of visible security headers and HTTPS confirmation suggests technical debt in security implementation. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tinaprimum.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tinaprimum.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.