Skip to main content

Security report for timetron.com

TIMETRON · Real Estate · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

46/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TIMETRON is a mature, family-owned investment company based in Vienna, Austria, with a diversified portfolio in consumer goods, medical devices, real estate, and e-commerce. The company has a strong market presence with 40 years of history and focuses on financing innovative brands and projects. The website reflects a professional business with good content quality and moderate branding consistency. Technically, the site uses a traditional Apache server with PHP and several JavaScript libraries but lacks modern security implementations such as HTTPS. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and security headers significantly impacts the security posture. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner but no dedicated privacy policy on the main domain. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security and privacy to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching timetron.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
46

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TIMETRON operates primarily in investment and development across multiple sectors including real estate, healthcare, and retail consumer goods. Its business model centers on financing and supporting brands and projects with a focus on quality and innovation. The company targets entrepreneurs, healthcare institutions, and consumers, leveraging a long-standing reputation and partnerships such as with First Austria. The website content and linked domains indicate a strategic focus on expanding e-commerce and maintaining strong partner relationships. Growth indicators include diversified investments and customer recognition for product quality. The company maintains a moderate digital presence with limited social media engagement.

Security posture

The website currently lacks HTTPS, exposing users to potential interception risks. No advanced security headers or policies are implemented, and there is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. While no known SSL vulnerabilities are detected, the absence of encryption and security best practices represents a critical risk. The cookie consent mechanism is present but the privacy policy is hosted on a partner domain, which may reduce transparency. Overall, the security maturity is low, and the company should prioritize SSL deployment, security header implementation, and clear security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide immediately.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated privacy policy and security policy on the main domain to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response process and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly update server software and PHP to supported versions to reduce vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on an Apache 2.4.6 server with PHP 7.3.33 and OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips, which is outdated and may pose security risks. The front-end uses Bootstrap, jQuery, Swiper, FontAwesome, and other JavaScript libraries to provide a responsive and interactive user experience. Performance data is missing, but the page size and resource count are zero, indicating incomplete performance metrics or caching issues. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and content structure. However, the lack of HTTPS and modern security practices is a significant technical debt. Hosting is with InterNetX GmbH, a reputable registrar, but no CDN or advanced hosting platform is detected. SEO and accessibility are basic but adequate for the site’s scope.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with timetron.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review timetron.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.