Skip to main content

Security report for timeservice.nl

Time Service · Transportation · Netherlands

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Time Service is a specialized company providing innovative software and hardware solutions for race tracks and motorsport timekeeping worldwide. Established since 2005, it offers the RSTime software suite for automating and optimizing race timing and circuit management, alongside licensed sports timing services and a webshop for timing hardware. The company targets race circuits, timekeepers, and motorsport event organizers, positioning itself as a trusted provider with over two decades of experience and global reach. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress platform with WooCommerce and Elementor, delivering a professional and responsive user experience. Security measures include HTTPS and DNSSEC, though additional security headers and privacy policies are recommended to enhance compliance and trust. Overall, the website reflects a moderate to good security posture with room for improvement in privacy compliance and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching timeservice.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
82
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on motorsport timing and race control solutions. Its business model combines software licensing, hardware sales via a webshop, and professional timing services. The market positioning is that of an established niche player with a strong technical foundation and a loyal customer base in the motorsport industry. Revenue streams likely include software sales, hardware products, and service contracts. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests potential areas for operational maturity improvement. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but the use of known timing hardware brands and software integrations indicates industry collaboration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of privacy and cookie policies indicate gaps in compliance and defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small specialized business but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR fully.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add explicit contact information including business emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Time Service
Description
RSTime software optimises and automates operations of tracks, race circuits and time keepers worldwide. The company provides innovative timing hardware, race control solutions, and sports timing services for auto- and motorsport events.
Key services
RSTime software for race timing and circuit automation, Race control and incident management solutions, Sports timing services with licensed timekeepers, Webshop for timing hardware products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, WooCommerce 10.2.2, Elementor 3.32.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Owl Carousel, Search Filter Pro plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or main content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  4. Website uses modern WordPress ecosystem technologies and plugins.
  5. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and policies.
  6. Content is focused on motorsport timing software and hardware solutions.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  8. No social media links or business contact details explicitly found.
  9. Website branding is consistent and professional.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building, indicating a flexible and maintainable infrastructure. The tech stack includes jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components. Hosting is provided by team.blue nl B.V., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and missing advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to improve privacy compliance and incident response readiness through technical and policy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with timeservice.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review timeservice.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.