Skip to main content

Security report for timbero.lv

Timbero · Real Estate · Latvia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Timbero.lv is a Latvian company specializing in the design and turnkey construction of wooden frame and glued laminated timber houses. The website targets Latvian-speaking customers interested in wooden residential construction, offering consultations, project design, and full construction services. The company positions itself as a niche provider in the Latvian real estate and construction market focused on wooden homes. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPML for multilingual support. It employs modern web technologies including JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating attention to GDPR compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and explicit privacy policy pages. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and safe for general audiences, but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching timbero.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and construction sector, focusing on wooden house projects in Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing design and construction services, including turnkey solutions. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise targeting local customers. The use of multilingual support indicates an intent to reach both Latvian and English-speaking clients. Marketing efforts leverage major ad networks and tracking tools to optimize customer acquisition. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The company demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with SEO and analytics integration but lacks visible certifications or detailed business registrations on the site.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts for analytics and marketing introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. The lack of a published privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting readiness for security events. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages clearly accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
  4. Add visible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer trust.
  5. Establish and publish incident response procedures and security contact channels to enhance security posture and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Timbero
Description
Koka karkasa mājas un guļbūves no līmētām brusām. Konsultācijas, projektēšana un privātmāju būvniecība līdz atslēgai.
Key services
Consultations, Design, Turnkey private house construction
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URLs
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site for a Latvian wooden house construction company.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot, showing GDPR compliance effort.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in the content.
  5. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content; SSL status unknown.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  8. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and WPML plugins, indicating a standard and widely supported platform. It uses JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading images and asynchronous script loading. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with timbero.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review timbero.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.