Skip to main content

Security report for tiltifyimpact.com

Tiltify, Inc. · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tiltify Impact is a specialized service provider partnering with non-profits, influencers, and celebrities to maximize philanthropic impact through digital and hybrid fundraising events. The company focuses on influencer-driven campaigns, large-scale digital telethons, and community fundraising on platforms like Twitch and YouTube. Their market position is strong within the niche of digital influencer philanthropy, supported by references to notable campaigns and a professional web presence. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap and Google Tag Manager, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but lacks some accessibility features and security headers. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security policies or headers detected. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data aligns well with the business founding date and shows no suspicious patterns, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tiltifyimpact.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tiltifyimpact.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for tiltifyimpact.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tiltify Impact operates in the non-profit sector, providing digital fundraising event management and consulting services primarily targeting influencers and content creators. Their business model revolves around leveraging social and creator-driven platforms to maximize fundraising impact. The company demonstrates competitive advantages through extensive experience with over 100,000 creator campaigns and notable industry events. Revenue streams likely include consulting fees and event management services. The target customer segments include non-profits seeking influencer partnerships and influencers aiming to build philanthropic legacies. The partnership ecosystem includes major content creators and celebrities. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand direct contact channels and formalize privacy and security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and employs Google Tag Manager for analytics, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Data protection practices are unclear, and no designated data protection officer contact is found. Incident response readiness appears minimal based on public information. The security culture is not explicitly communicated. Business impact of these gaps is moderate, primarily affecting compliance and user trust rather than immediate technical risk.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  4. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to improve transparency and security posture.
  5. Add direct contact information such as company email and phone number on the website to increase trust and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tiltify, Inc.
Description
We partner with non-profits and influencers to maximize impact together through hybrid & virtual events and campaigns. We specialize in digital influencer and celebrity-based projects utilizing social and creator driven platforms.
Key services
Large-scale digital telethons, Celebrity social community campaigns, Influencer-driven events, Event analysis, Brainstorming sessions, Fundraising strategy consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.0, Google Fonts (Inter, Lora), Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No forms with visible input fields on main page (contact form is on separate /contact/ page)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is limited to a contact form on a separate page; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Site uses modern frontend technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  5. No visible security headers or explicit security policies published.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is new but consistent with business claims.
  7. Content is professional, focused on non-profit and influencer fundraising events.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 5.3 and Google Fonts, with analytics implemented via Google Tag Manager. Hosting is on Amazon AWS as indicated by DNS nameservers. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS or backend platform is detected, suggesting a static or custom-built site. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed metrics available. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated libraries. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and security configurations to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tiltifyimpact.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tiltifyimpact.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.