Skip to main content

Security report for thomann-hanry.co.uk

Heritage Building Conservation Ltd t/as Styles Façade Solutions · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Styles Façade Solutions, trading as Heritage Building Conservation Ltd, is a UK-based specialist in scaffold-free façade cleaning and restoration, leveraging patented façade gommage technology. The company positions itself as a market leader in façade cleaning and restoration services, targeting commercial and heritage building owners. Their website is professionally designed, content-rich, and optimized for user experience, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with modern analytics and tracking tools, and employs security best practices such as HTTPS and reCAPTCHA on forms. Privacy compliance is robust with clear cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned policies. Security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional HTTP security headers and DNSSEC. The domain WHOIS data shows an unusual future creation date, suggesting a recent domain transfer or re-registration, which should be verified for legitimacy. Overall, the website and business present a trustworthy and professional front with minor technical and administrative improvements recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thomann-hanry.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
73
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector focusing on façade cleaning, restoration, and maintenance services. Their business model is that of a main contractor offering specialized scaffold-free cleaning technology, which provides competitive advantages in efficiency and minimal disruption. The target customers include commercial property managers and heritage building custodians. The company demonstrates strong market positioning with a 20-year history, multiple certifications, and a comprehensive portfolio of projects. Their partnership ecosystem includes related brands such as Thomann-Hanry. Growth indicators include active news updates, social media presence, and customer testimonials. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and cookie consent management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. Incident response and security policy documents are not found, indicating room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced to align with best practices and compliance frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  5. Review third-party scripts and tracking tools for privacy compliance and minimize unnecessary data collection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Heritage Building Conservation Ltd t/as Styles Façade Solutions
Registration number
05895254
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Heritage Building Conservation Ltd t/as Styles Façade Solutions
Description
Styles Façade Solutions are UK leading property restoration specialists offering scaffold-free façade cleaning, restoration, refurbishment, and building surveys with patented façade gommage technology.
Key services
Façade cleaning (façade gommage®), Façade restoration, Façade refurbishment projects, Building surveys, Façade protection, Painting and decorating, Façade maintenance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Hotjar, CookieYes cookie consent, Feefo reviews widget, Typekit fonts
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
CookieYes, Feefo reviews
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is comprehensive, professional, and business-focused on façade cleaning and restoration.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple social media and external trusted links present.
  5. Contact information is complete and includes physical address, phone, email, and contact form.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain creation date in future, which is unusual and should be verified.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. It uses Typekit fonts and Feefo for customer reviews. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site includes multiple interactive elements such as sliders and forms with reCAPTCHA protection. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring for security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thomann-hanry.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thomann-hanry.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.