Skip to main content

Security report for pggroup.com.mt

PG plc · Real Estate · Malta

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PG plc is a reputable investment company based in Malta, focusing on diversified ventures including real estate, supermarkets, and fashion retail brands such as ZARA and ZARA HOME. The company employs over 350 people and targets local economic growth through sustainable investments. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a clear business model and a solid market position in the Maltese Islands. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several popular plugins, providing a good user experience with moderate performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pggroup.com.mt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PG plc operates as an essential investment entity within Malta's real estate and retail sectors. Its diversified portfolio includes supermarkets and fashion retail, leveraging well-known brands to maintain market presence. The company provides investor-focused content such as financial statements and corporate governance, indicating transparency. The business model relies on local economic engagement and sustainable growth. The website's content and structure support investor relations and customer engagement, though direct contact details are limited to a contact form. The absence of privacy policies may impact compliance with GDPR and user trust. No suspicious domains or partners were identified, suggesting a focused and legitimate business ecosystem.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and uses Google Analytics with outbound link tracking. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security contact information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security certifications are evident. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR. While no immediate vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected, the security posture is basic and could be improved to enhance protection and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to facilitate vulnerability reporting and response.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance transparency and trust by including data retention policies and information about data protection officers if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PG plc
Description
PG plc (Company/PG Group) is a reputable investment company investing in a number of successful ventures in the Maltese Islands. Over the years, the Company grew its operation and invested in a number of sustainable and attractive opportunities. Its sole purpose is directed towards the local economy and in fact it employs no less than 350 people. The business activities are well diversified and include real estate, supermarket and fashion.
Key services
Real estate investment, Supermarket operations, Fashion retail (ZARA, ZARA HOME)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, LayerSlider, jQuery, Google Analytics, Contact Form 7, Fusion Builder
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Avada Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Analytics with outbound link tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found
  3. Terms and Conditions page is present and linked
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the HTML
  5. Use of modern WordPress theme and plugins with standard tracking scripts
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies
  7. Business information is clear and consistent with domain registration
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme and several plugins like LayerSlider and Contact Form 7. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on CDNs for fonts and scripts. No advanced hosting provider information is available. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and some SEO optimizations could be improved. Technical debt appears low but security enhancements are recommended to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pggroup.com.mt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pggroup.com.mt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.