Skip to main content

Security report for theodia.org

hemmer.ch SA · Non-profit · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Theodia.org is a specialized online platform providing free tools for managing and displaying Roman Catholic mass schedules worldwide. The website is operated by hemmer.ch SA, a Swiss organization with a domain registration dating back to 2008, indicating a stable and established presence. The platform targets the Roman Catholic community and users interested in service schedules, offering a niche but valuable service. Technically, the website is built using modern Angular framework and integrates Google Maps API for location-based features, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The design is professional and mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security policies, which are essential for compliance and user trust. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and implementing security headers. Overall, the website is legitimate and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching theodia.org

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Theodia operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on religious service scheduling. Its business model is service-oriented and free to users, targeting a niche market within the Roman Catholic community. The company benefits from a long domain history and consistent registration data, which supports its credibility. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its specialized service and integration with mapping technologies. There is no evidence of advertising or monetization strategies, suggesting a focus on community service rather than revenue generation. The absence of contact details and formal policies may limit growth potential and user trust. Strategic partnerships or expanded service offerings could enhance market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves the domain vulnerable to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers were detected, which could expose the site to clickjacking, XSS, and other web-based attacks. There is no visible incident response contact or security policy, which is a compliance and operational risk. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security
  4. Publish contact information including a security incident response contact and data protection officer details
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
hemmer.ch SA
Description
Theodia is a free tool for managing and displaying schedules for Roman Catholic services in the world.
Key services
Management and display of Roman Catholic service schedules
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular (ng-version=19.2.13), Google Maps API, Roboto font, Material Design Components
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche service for Roman Catholic mass schedules
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No explicit contact information or security policies provided
  4. Uses modern Angular framework and Google Maps API for location services
  5. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  6. Domain is well-established and registered to a Swiss organization
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

Theodia.org uses a modern Angular framework (version 19.2.13) and integrates Google Maps API for geolocation services, indicating a contemporary and scalable technical infrastructure. The site loads Roboto fonts and Material Design components, contributing to a consistent and user-friendly interface. Hosting and domain registration are managed by reputable providers, with DNS servers hosted on pinkhemmer.ch. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The absence of CMS suggests a custom or framework-based site. Opportunities exist to improve performance through enhanced caching and security through additional headers and DNSSEC.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with theodia.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review theodia.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.