Skip to main content

Security report for themescamp.com

Themes Camp · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Themes Camp is a small technology business specializing in the development and sale of professional WordPress themes and web templates. Their website targets website managers and developers seeking easy-to-use, customizable themes without coding. The company has a moderate market presence with over 12,500 users and partnerships with major platforms like Elementor and ThemeForest. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several plugins, with good SEO and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts, but lacks some security headers and published policies. The absence of WHOIS data raises legitimacy concerns, though the website content and branding appear professional. Contact is available via a form but lacks direct emails or phone numbers. Privacy and cookie policies are not found, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching themescamp.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Themes Camp operates in the WordPress themes and templates market, leveraging partnerships with major platforms to enhance credibility. Their business model focuses on digital product sales with a user base of 12,500+. The company emphasizes ease of use and customization, appealing to small and medium businesses and individual website owners. Their marketing ecosystem includes SEO tools and analytics, but lacks direct contact details and formal privacy documentation. Growth potential exists through improved compliance and expanded contact channels. The partnership ecosystem includes ThemeForest, Elementor, WordPress.org, and Slider Revolution, indicating integration with industry leaders.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, and no security.txt or incident response policies are published. The lack of direct contact emails for security or abuse reporting reduces incident response readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file and clearly publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to facilitate security communication.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for support and security reporting to improve transparency and responsiveness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them to maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Themes Camp
Description
Themes Camp offers professional WordPress themes and web templates designed to help users build great websites without coding. They provide ready-to-use themes and front-end tools trusted by over 12,500 users to manage websites easily and effectively.
Key services
WordPress Themes, HTML Templates, Web Templates, Theme Discounts, Support and Documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Rank Math SEO, Easy Digital Downloads, Nexa Blocks Plugin
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Clarity scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is not registered, which is unusual for an active business website.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or metadata.
  4. Contact information is available only via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack with Elementor as the primary page builder. It uses several plugins including Easy Digital Downloads and Nexa Blocks, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics. The site loads CSS and JS resources asynchronously and uses modern fonts and icon libraries. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by Rank Math plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Cards. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for improvement. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with themescamp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review themescamp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.