Skip to main content

Security report for thefivepeaks.org

Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com · Retail · Japan

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Thefivepeaks.org is a Japanese-language website focused on providing rankings and reviews of popular over-the-counter acne lotions and skincare products. It targets Japanese consumers interested in acne treatment and skincare, operating primarily as a content and affiliate marketing platform. The site is relatively new, established in 2022, and hosted on a Japanese hosting provider. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It employs HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, indicating a moderate security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which presents compliance risks. Contact options are limited to a contact form with no direct emails or phone numbers. The site includes external affiliate or advertising links and uses Research Artisan Pro for analytics and tracking, reflecting moderate user tracking. Overall, the website quality and professionalism are basic, with limited trust signals and branding consistency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thefivepeaks.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention thefivepeaks.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for thefivepeaks.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the Japanese skincare retail sector, focusing on acne-related cosmetic products. Its business model appears to be content-driven affiliate marketing, leveraging product rankings and user reviews to generate revenue. The target audience is Japanese consumers seeking acne treatment solutions. The site lacks direct business transparency, relying on WHOIS privacy protection, which is common for small content sites. There are no visible certifications or social media presence, limiting its competitive positioning. External links suggest partnerships or affiliate relationships with various unrelated domains. Growth potential depends on improving content quality, compliance, and trust indicators.

Security posture

The security maturity of thefivepeaks.org is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks DNSSEC and critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The absence of direct contact emails for security or abuse reporting reduces incident response readiness. Tracking scripts are present, but privacy compliance is poor. No visible vulnerabilities or malware were detected, but the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and policies to improve trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  4. Add direct contact information including security and abuse reporting emails to enhance incident response capabilities.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com
Description
The website provides rankings and reviews of popular over-the-counter acne lotions and skincare products, focusing on improving acne scars and skin health through recommended cosmetic products.
Key services
Product rankings, User reviews, Skincare advice
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Japanese and focused on acne skincare product recommendations.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact available only via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No social media links or business certifications present.
  5. Uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC.
  6. Includes external links to multiple unrelated domains, likely affiliate or advertising related.
  7. Tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro are present, indicating user analytics and tracking.
  8. Website design and content quality are basic with limited professional polish.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without a detectable CMS or modern frameworks. It is hosted on a Japanese hosting provider (Xserver) with multiple Japanese nameservers. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with canonical tags and meta viewport settings but lacks advanced optimization. The site uses a third-party analytics and tracking service (Research Artisan Pro). There is no evidence of technical debt but modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS for easier content management and improving security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thefivepeaks.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thefivepeaks.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.