Skip to main content

Security report for thecargoagency.com

Cargo · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cargo operates a professional website focused on cargo and logistics agency services, targeting businesses and individuals in need of transportation solutions. The site is built on WordPress and employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, and various analytics and tracking tools. The website demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, with structured data implemented for enhanced search engine understanding. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security measures such as HTTPS and reCAPTCHA are in place, but the lack of security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates room for improvement in security posture and compliance. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency to strengthen trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thecargoagency.com

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cargo appears to be a small-sized transportation or logistics service provider with a clear brand identity. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on cargo agency offerings. The website content is relevant but limited in detail about the company's history, certifications, or legal information. The extensive use of third-party analytics and tracking suggests a focus on marketing and user behavior analysis, though without visible consent mechanisms. The lack of contact details and business registration information limits the ability to fully assess business credibility. No related or partner domains were identified, indicating a possibly standalone operation or limited public partnerships.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the scanned content, but the lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy suggests limited incident response readiness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no GDPR indicators. The extensive tracking scripts without consent mechanisms may expose the business to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to improve legitimacy and trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance incident response and transparency.
  5. Review and update third-party scripts regularly to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cargo
Description
Cargo is a business website likely related to logistics or agency services, indicated by the brand name and logo. The site is in English and targets a general audience interested in their services.
Key services
Cargo agency services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Use of security and analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Quantcast
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel, Quantcast, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the scanned content.
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts are used, but no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and modern front-end libraries.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the scanned HTML content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. Site branding is consistent with a professional logo and theme.
  9. SEO metadata and JSON-LD structured data are present and well-formed.
  10. No explicit business registration or certification information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and Font Awesome. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and ZoomInfo Pixel. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. No critical technical issues or broken elements were detected, indicating a stable technical infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thecargoagency.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thecargoagency.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.