Skip to main content

Security report for tgmassociates.com

TGM Associates · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TGM Associates is a specialized real estate investment and management company focusing exclusively on multifamily apartment communities within the Continental United States. Established in 1999, the company manages all aspects of acquiring, managing, and selling multifamily properties for investor clients and itself. Their key services include property management, leasing, consulting, maintenance, investment analysis, and tenant representation. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting apartment investors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor, with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Vegas.js for UI enhancements. Accessibility is enhanced by the integration of AccessiBe, and the site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with no major technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protections enabled. However, it lacks several security headers and does not publicly disclose security policies or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific disclosures. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could improve its privacy compliance and security posture by adding cookie consent, security policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy with a long registration history and consistent registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tgmassociates.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
58
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tgmassociates.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tgmassociates.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TGM Associates operates in a niche real estate market focusing on multifamily apartment communities, providing end-to-end services from acquisition to management and disposition. Their business model centers on investor partnerships and property management services, targeting institutional and private apartment investors. The company’s long domain age and consistent branding indicate market stability. The absence of extensive marketing or analytics tools suggests a focus on direct client relationships rather than broad consumer marketing. The company leverages partnerships with accessibility service providers to enhance compliance and user experience. Growth indicators include a comprehensive service offering and a clear geographic focus on the US multifamily market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security contact information is publicly available, which could delay response to security incidents. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-specific disclosures. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate informational site but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve browser security.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TGM Associates
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TGM Associates
Description
TGM Associates is a fully integrated group of companies focused on multifamily communities within the Continental United States, responsible for acquiring, managing, and selling multifamily communities on behalf of investor clients and themselves.
Key services
Commercial Property Management, Residential Leasing Services, Real Estate Consulting, Property Maintenance Solutions, Investment Property Analysis, Tenant Representation Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Maps API, Vegas.js (slideshow), AccessiBe (accessibility widget)
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
AccessiBe (accessibility compliance tool)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on multifamily apartment investment and management.
  3. No cookie consent banner or explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms found.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. No incident response or security contact emails found.
  6. Privacy policy is present but basic; no terms of service detected.
  7. Use of modern WordPress and Elementor technologies.
  8. Good mobile and accessibility support including AccessiBe widget.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. The use of jQuery and Vegas.js supports interactive UI elements such as slideshows. Accessibility is enhanced through the integration of AccessiBe, indicating attention to compliance with accessibility standards. The site loads with moderate performance, likely due to multiple CSS and JS assets. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format, improving search engine visibility. The technical stack is current but could benefit from performance optimizations such as asset minification and caching strategies. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the domain registrar is Network Solutions, LLC.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tgmassociates.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tgmassociates.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.