Skip to main content

Security report for tgm.co.uk

TGM · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TGM is a UK-based family-operated business specializing in commercial roofing and drainage maintenance, founded in 1997. The company holds a strong market position as a premier specialist partner for working at height, offering a range of services including roof maintenance, reactive repairs, fall protection systems, gutter and drain cleaning, and lightning surge protection. Their national contracts and advanced surveying capabilities underscore their technical maturity and operational scale. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and Google Analytics for performance and user insights. Hosting and domain registration via Cloudflare provide robust infrastructure support. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers and dedicated security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data confirms a long-standing domain registration consistent with the business history, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, TGM's digital presence reflects a professional and credible business with good security posture and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and security headers would further strengthen their security maturity and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tgm.co.uk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TGM operates in the real estate and building maintenance sector, targeting commercial and industrial clients across the UK. Their business model focuses on specialized maintenance services with a strong emphasis on safety and quality. The company benefits from a family-operated legacy, certifications, and national contracts, positioning them competitively. Their partnership ecosystem includes recognized industry accreditations, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators include adoption of advanced technology and 24/7 support capabilities. The company maintains active social media channels to engage clients and stakeholders.

Security posture

TGM demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. No signs of vulnerabilities or data exposure were found, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. GDPR compliance is supported by privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, suggesting potential gaps in transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a stronger security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TGM
Description
TGM are maintenance specialists in commercial roofing and drainage. They maintain roofs, drains, and fall protection equipment. Founded in 1997, family-operated, with national contracts and advanced surveying capabilities.
Key services
Roof maintenance & repairs, Reactive maintenance, Fall protection systems, Gutter cleaning, Drain cleaning, Siphonic drainage, Lightning & surge protection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.0.2, Elementor 4.1.4, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit, All in One SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  3. Multiple certifications and accreditations displayed, enhancing trust.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including email and phone.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information on site.
  6. Use of modern CMS and page builder (WordPress + Elementor).
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking with consent banner.
  8. No evidence of suspicious or malicious content.
  9. No terms of service page found.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, supported by jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting and domain registration are managed by Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading and asynchronous script loading. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and accessibility could be addressed to reduce risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tgm.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tgm.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.