Skip to main content

Security report for tff.se

Trafikförsäkringsföreningen · Transportation · Sweden

High risk. 18 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trafikförsäkringsföreningen (TFF) is a Swedish organization dedicated to ensuring traffic safety and managing compulsory traffic insurance for vehicles in Sweden and Swedish road users abroad. The website provides comprehensive information about insurance requirements, claims handling, and traffic safety, targeting vehicle owners and insurance companies. The organization holds a key position in the Swedish transportation insurance sector, offering essential services and information to its audience. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including jQuery, Material-UI, and Microsoft Azure hosting, with integrated analytics from Piwik Pro and Microsoft Application Insights. The site demonstrates good digital maturity with responsive design, accessibility features, and a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes consent management for cookies, but lacks explicit HTTP security headers and a public security policy or incident response contact. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, indicating a legitimate and trustworthy domain. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, serving its audience effectively. Strategic improvements in security headers and transparency around security policies could further enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

18 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tff.se

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
63
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TFF operates as a non-profit entity managing compulsory traffic insurance in Sweden, serving vehicle owners, insurance companies, and traffic participants. Its market position is strong as a national authority in traffic insurance. The business model focuses on regulatory compliance, claims management, and information dissemination. Revenue streams likely include fees related to insurance administration. The target customers are Swedish vehicle owners and insurance providers. The organization maintains partnerships with Microsoft Azure and Cookie Information for hosting and consent management. Growth indicators include comprehensive online resources and multilingual support. The website reflects a mature digital presence aligned with organizational goals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. The use of Microsoft Application Insights and Piwik Pro indicates active monitoring and analytics. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of a published security or incident response policy represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, regular third-party script audits, and publishing a security policy to improve incident response readiness and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Ensure all forms include anti-CSRF tokens and secure input validation.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Trafikförsäkringsföreningen
Description
Trafikförsäkringsföreningen (TFF) contributes to traffic safety in Sweden and for Swedish road users abroad. The organization provides information and services related to traffic insurance, claims, and regulations.
Key services
Traffic insurance claims handling, Information on insurance requirements, Support for insurance companies, Traffic safety information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, jQuery UI 1.12.0, Microsoft Application Insights, Piwik Pro Analytics, Cookie Information Consent Management, DataTables, Mark.js, React (inferred from MUI styles and components)
Frameworks
Material-UI (MUI)
Platforms
Microsoft Azure
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded via HTTPS)
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik Pro, Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik Pro, Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Cookie Information Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and descriptions.
  2. Content is primarily in Swedish with English alternate language links.
  3. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks for UI and analytics.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers directly on the homepage; contact is via contact page.
  5. No explicit terms of service page found in the provided content.
  6. Privacy policy and cookie policy are clearly presented and GDPR compliant.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  9. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good accessibility features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Microsoft Azure and uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Material-UI, and Episerver CMS. It integrates advanced analytics via Piwik Pro and Microsoft Application Insights. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of third-party scripts and resource loading. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence, though some technical debt exists in the form of missing security headers and potential for enhanced performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tff.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tff.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.