Skip to main content

Security report for tfaforms.com

FormAssembly, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FormAssembly, Inc. operates a secure data collection SaaS platform focused on providing businesses and organizations with tools to build secure forms and manage data collection efficiently. The company has an established market presence since 2009 and targets business users requiring secure and compliant data handling solutions. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant business content. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Font Awesome 6, and integrates analytics and user engagement tools like Pendo and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is via Amazon AWS, ensuring reliable infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, CSRF protection on forms, and domain transfer restrictions, though improvements are possible by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy and terms policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, though no explicit cookie consent mechanism was detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-maintained, and suitable for its business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tfaforms.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tfaforms.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
19,521
Employees
0
Customers
19,443
Third parties
78
Weak passwords
14%

22 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tfaforms.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FormAssembly positions itself as a secure form and data collection provider in the technology sector, leveraging a SaaS business model. Its competitive advantage lies in secure data handling and compliance features, appealing to organizations with sensitive data needs. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans and enterprise services. The company targets medium to large businesses and institutions requiring secure data collection. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with Salesforce (evidenced by Live Agent chat) and analytics providers. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, supporting growth and customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place. The login form includes CSRF tokens and password input enhancements. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response contact is available via an abuse reporting page. The company publishes a dedicated security information page, indicating awareness and commitment to security best practices. GDPR compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Consider adding direct company contact emails and phone numbers on support or contact pages to improve transparency and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FormAssembly, Inc.
Description
Secure data collection made simple.
Key services
Secure form building, Data collection, User account management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome 6, Google Tag Manager, Pendo, Salesforce Live Agent Chat
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer and update prohibited domain status
  • CSRF token in login form
  • Password input with show/hide toggle

Analytics and tracking

Services
Pendo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Pendo
Marketing tools
Pendo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and business-focused on secure data collection.
  3. No explicit or adult content detected.
  4. Security practices are good but could be improved with DNSSEC and security headers.
  5. Privacy and terms policies are present and comprehensive.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the login page; contact likely via support pages.
  7. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools like Pendo and Google Tag Manager.
  8. Domain registration data supports legitimacy and consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and stable technology stack including jQuery and Font Awesome 6 for UI components, with integrations for analytics (Pendo, Google Tag Manager) and Salesforce Live Agent for customer support chat. Hosting is on Amazon AWS, indicated by DNS servers. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site could improve technical robustness by adding security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports reliable and secure business operations with room for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tfaforms.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tfaforms.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.