Skip to main content

Security report for tevirgroup.com

Tevir Group · Real Estate · Isle of Man

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tevir Group is a privately-held investment management company based in the Isle of Man, focusing on a diversified portfolio including property management, redevelopment, venture capital investments, and facilities management. The company targets investors and business partners interested in regional investment opportunities with social and economic impact. Their market position is niche, emphasizing Isle of Man commercial properties and early-stage engineering ventures. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, and Google Analytics, hosted partially on Amazon S3 for media assets. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and consistent branding, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and trusted third-party analytics but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and cookie policies present but no active consent mechanism or GDPR compliance statements. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image with moderate risk. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency would enhance their security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tevirgroup.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tevirgroup.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for tevirgroup.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tevir Group operates as an important entity in the real estate and finance sectors, managing a portfolio of subsidiaries focused on property and venture capital investments. Their business model centers on generating returns with positive social impact, targeting investors and regional stakeholders. The company leverages partnerships such as Biosphere and maintains a LinkedIn presence to support credibility. Revenue streams likely include property management, investment returns, and facilities services. Growth indicators include active news updates and diversified subsidiaries. The partnership ecosystem includes technology and sustainability affiliations, though no direct payment processors or critical service providers were identified from the domain analysis.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data but lacks comprehensive security headers and published security or incident response policies. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance beyond basic privacy and cookie policies, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of contact channels for security incidents reduces incident response readiness. The security culture appears minimal but not negligent. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected, but improvements are needed to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by adding explicit GDPR statements and a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tevir Group
Description
Tevir Group is an Isle of Man based privately-held investment management company with a growing portfolio of interests.
Key services
Investment management, Property portfolio management, Property redevelopment, Private equity and venture capital investments, Facilities management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.0.0, jQuery 1.12.4, Popper.js 1.12.9, Slick Carousel, WOW.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding.
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage or footer; contact is via a contact page form only.
  3. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit GDPR compliance statements or consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and external trusted services for analytics and hosting.
  6. No visible terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn.
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the homepage or footer.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable and widely used technology stack including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, and Popper.js, ensuring responsive design and interactive elements. Hosting of media assets on Amazon S3 supports scalability and reliability. Performance is moderate with no major technical debt observed. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic and could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated further by adopting modern security headers and improving privacy mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tevirgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tevirgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.