Skip to main content

Security report for tessi.lv

Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website tessi.lv operates as an e-commerce platform specializing in florist materials, artificial flowers, and gift packaging products. It targets both retail customers and wholesale clients primarily in Latvia, offering a variety of products such as gift boxes, ribbons, floral decorations, and seasonal items. The site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging plugins like Smart Slider 3 for enhanced user experience and Google services for analytics and advertising. The business appears to be a small local retailer with a consistent brand presence and clear contact information, including phone numbers and physical address in Riga. From a technical perspective, the website employs modern web technologies and maintains a moderate performance level with good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is supported by accessible privacy and terms of service pages, indicating GDPR awareness, though no cookie consent banner was detected. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front for its business domain, though the absence of WHOIS data limits full verification of domain legitimacy. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access and analysis. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing a cookie consent mechanism, and adding a security.txt file to improve transparency and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tessi.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
33
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tessi.lv positions itself as a niche e-commerce retailer and wholesaler in the florist and gift packaging sector within Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in a broad product catalog tailored to both individual and business customers, supported by an online store with clear navigation and product categorization. The business model combines direct online sales with physical store presence, as indicated by the address and service notes. Revenue streams are primarily product sales, with potential growth in wholesale partnerships. The company leverages Google advertising and analytics tools to drive traffic and monitor user behavior. The absence of explicit certifications or large-scale partnerships suggests a small to medium enterprise with local market focus.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of WordPress and WooCommerce necessitates regular updates and monitoring to mitigate plugin-related vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or insecure forms were detected, indicating sound basic security hygiene.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding explicit contact emails and expanding trust signals such as certifications or customer testimonials to boost business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Dāvanu iepakojuma preces. Floristikas preces. Mākslīgie ziedi. FLowerbox ziediem, dāvanu kastes, dāvanu maisiņi, satīna lentes, folija, ziemassvētku dekorpreces, sausie izstrādājumi, preces svētkiem.
Key services
Online sales of florist materials, Artificial flowers, Gift packaging materials, Wholesale and retail sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Smart Slider 3, Google Analytics, Google AdSense
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WooCommerce and WordPress)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce platform focused on florist and gift packaging products.
  2. Uses WordPress and WooCommerce with several plugins for enhanced UX.
  3. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and accessible.
  4. No email addresses explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  5. Phone numbers with clear company context are present in header.
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  8. HTTPS is enabled and Google Analytics and AdSense are integrated.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses jQuery and Smart Slider 3 for interactive UI components and Google Analytics and AdSense for tracking and monetization. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with some large images used in sliders but lazy loading is partially implemented. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and labels present. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are technical debt areas to address. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tessi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tessi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.