Tesla Service SIA is a specialized automotive service provider based in Latvia, focusing on Tesla and other electric vehicles. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including diagnostics, repair, maintenance, battery and motor servicing, electrical system programming, accident repairs, bodywork, painting, and detailing. They maintain partnerships with several major insurance companies, enhancing their market credibility and service reach. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with a clear focus on user experience and service presentation.
From a technical perspective, the website employs a modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Google Site Kit. It integrates Google Analytics and AdSense for tracking and monetization. The site uses HTTPS with Google reCAPTCHA protecting the contact form, indicating a reasonable security posture. However, the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies highlights areas for improvement in compliance and security best practices.
Security-wise, the site shows no signs of vulnerabilities or malicious content. The use of HTTPS and CAPTCHA enhances protection against common threats. The lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information suggests limited transparency in security management. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and business information appear consistent and professional.
Overall, Tesla Service SIA presents a credible and focused business with a well-structured online presence. To enhance trust and compliance, it is recommended to publish privacy and cookie policies, implement security headers, and provide incident response contacts. These steps will improve the security posture and regulatory adherence, supporting sustainable business growth.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention teslaservice.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for teslaservice.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Tesla Service SIA operates in the niche market of electric vehicle servicing in Latvia, targeting Tesla owners and other EV users. Their competitive advantage lies in specialized expertise, comprehensive service offerings, and strong insurance partnerships with Balta AS, Balcia Insurance, If P & C Insurance AS, and Gjensidige Baltic. The business model centers on direct service provision with revenue streams from diagnostics, repairs, parts sales, and accident-related services. The company leverages digital marketing through social media channels and Google services to reach its audience. Growth indicators include active partnerships and a professional web presence. The partnership ecosystem strengthens market position and customer trust, positioning Tesla Service as a key local player in EV maintenance and repair.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting user input forms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The lack of published privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact information for security issues. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls to mitigate risks and enhance user trust.
Recommendations
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen site security.
Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
Add incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain performance.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Tesla Service SIA
Description
Tesla Service SIA provides specialized automotive services focused on Tesla and other electric vehicles in Latvia. Their offerings include diagnostics and repair of running gear, brake system maintenance, battery and motor repair and replacement, electrical work including block programming, spare parts sales, accident repairs, bodywork, painting, windshield replacement, and detailing.
Key services
Running gear diagnostics and repair, Brake system maintenance, Battery and motor repair and replacement, Electrical system work and block programming, Spare parts sales, Accident repairs and bodywork, Painting and detailing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Google AdSense, Contact Form 7 plugin, Site Kit by Google, Uncode Theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Ad networks
Google AdSense
Marketing tools
Site Kit by Google
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is a WordPress-based service site for Tesla and electric vehicle repairs in Latvia.
Content is professionally presented with clear service descriptions and contact options.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found, indicating compliance gaps.
Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
Social media presence on major platforms enhances trust and marketing reach.
WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
No security.txt or incident response information published.
HTTPS is enabled with Google Analytics and AdSense scripts present.
No security headers detected in HTML source.
No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the Uncode theme and several popular plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Site Kit by Google. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates Google Analytics and AdSense for tracking and monetization. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security hardening and performance optimization. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but has opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with teslaservice.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teslaservice.lv.