Skip to main content

Security report for terredeliens.org

Terre de Liens · Non-profit · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Terre de Liens is a well-established French non-profit organization dedicated to preserving agricultural land and supporting sustainable farming practices. The organization operates through a network of associations, an investment solidarity enterprise, and a public utility foundation. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with good content quality, clear navigation, and a focus on community engagement and transparency. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools, hosted under reputable providers with HTTPS enabled. However, explicit privacy policies and terms of service are not readily found, and security headers are not visibly implemented, indicating areas for improvement in compliance and security posture. Overall, the domain registration data supports the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching terredeliens.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position in the French non-profit sector focused on agriculture and sustainability. Their business model leverages community involvement, investment in farmland, and support for new farmers. The website targets a broad audience including citizens, farmers, volunteers, and donors. The presence of multiple regional subdomains and a large member base indicates a medium-sized organization with significant reach. The lack of direct contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on online engagement and possibly centralized contact points elsewhere. The partnership ecosystem includes internal subdomains for members and farms, reinforcing a cohesive brand and service offering.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited status flags. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies or incident response contacts limits the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, DNSSEC activation, and a public security.txt file to improve transparency and incident handling readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage or footer.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  5. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Terre de Liens
Description
Assemblage inédit d’acteurs et actrices de la société civile, du monde agricole et de la finance solidaire, le mouvement Terre de Liens tire son originalité de l'articulation entre un réseau associatif actif dans toute la France, une entreprise d’investissement solidaire et une fondation reconnue d’utilité publique. Terre de Liens agit pour préserver les terres agricoles, installer une nouvelle génération paysanne sur des fermes en agriculture biologique, et recréer du lien entre paysans et citoyens, tout en favorisant la biodiversité et le respect des sols.
Key services
Preserving agricultural land, Supporting farmer installations, Facilitating farm transmission, Mobilizing citizens, Accompanying local authorities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security status domain flags (clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French.
  2. Strong focus on agricultural land preservation and community involvement.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or main navigation.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with vendor-specific consent controls.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  7. WHOIS data shows a well-established domain with no privacy protection.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Alpine.js for frontend interactivity, Matomo and Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Facebook SDK for social media integration. Hosting is managed via OVH sas with DNS through Cloudflare, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and optimized images. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks visible CMS identification but appears custom-built or uses a lightweight framework. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could improve in security configurations and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with terredeliens.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review terredeliens.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.