Skip to main content

Security report for teralytics.net

Teralytics Inc. · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teralytics Inc. operates a specialized platform focused on mobility data analytics, providing innovative solutions such as Flow and Matrix to transport operators, planners, and modelers. The company is positioned as a trusted partner for leading transport agencies across North America and Europe, offering data-driven insights to optimize transit systems and infrastructure investments. Their business model centers on B2B SaaS offerings that leverage large-scale mobility data to improve transportation efficiency and sustainability. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and scripts, including HubSpot for marketing and analytics, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of explicit security policies and incident response information suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website reflects a professional and credible business presence with strong trust indicators and a clear focus on transportation data intelligence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teralytics.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teralytics holds a competitive position in the transportation analytics market, leveraging partnerships with major transport agencies to validate its offerings. The company’s key services address critical needs in transit planning and operations, providing reliable origin-destination matrices and digital twin capabilities. Their target customers include transport operators, planners, and modelers who require accurate and actionable mobility data. The use of HubSpot tools indicates a mature marketing strategy aimed at lead generation and customer engagement. The website content and client logos reinforce credibility and market acceptance. However, the lack of direct contact details and formal security disclosures may limit trust for some enterprise clients. Growth potential is supported by the expanding demand for data-driven mobility solutions in urban and regional transport sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. Use of reputable third-party scripts and absence of known vulnerable libraries contribute positively. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates a moderate maturity level in security governance. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could be improved to enhance protection against common web attacks. The site uses secure forms (Contact Form 7) but does not explicitly mention anti-CSRF or input validation measures. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing and informational site but could be strengthened to meet higher enterprise security expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement and disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teralytics Inc.
Description
Teralytics is a platform for viewing and understanding the movement of people and vehicles, providing data intelligence to improve mobility, trusted by leading transport agencies and operators.
Key services
Flow - Digital Twin of Transit Systems, Matrix - Origin-Destination Mobility Demand Matrices
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Font Awesome, HubSpot scripts, Contact Form 7, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts from reputable sources

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Ads Pixel, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing Tools
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on transportation data analytics and mobility solutions.
  3. Multiple client logos and case studies enhance trust.
  4. Use of HubSpot marketing and analytics tools indicates marketing maturity.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Multilingual support via WPML plugin is implemented.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Owl Carousel for UI components. HubSpot integration provides marketing automation and analytics capabilities. The site is multilingual using WPML, supporting English and German. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies but no major bottlenecks detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and semantic HTML enhancements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, canonical links, and structured navigation. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and supports the business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teralytics.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teralytics.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.