Skip to main content

Security report for teovia.cz

Teo via nadační fond · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teo via nadační fond is a Czech non-profit foundation established in 2021, dedicated to supporting church congregations, parishes, and Christian organizations through sustainable financing and community support. The foundation aims to empower clergy by providing financial and organizational assistance, promoting active lay participation in church life. The website reflects a focused mission with clear content and a professional design tailored to its target audience of church communities and supporters. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Matomo analytics, hosted under a Czech registrar consistent with its origin. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though it lacks some security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and trustworthy, supporting the foundation's legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teovia.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
85
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on church-related financial support and community development. Its business model revolves around fundraising, grant distribution, and community engagement within Czech and Slovak religious contexts. Partnerships with donation platforms and media outlets enhance its outreach and credibility. The organization targets church communities and laypersons interested in supporting sustainable church activities. The website's content and partner ecosystem indicate a stable niche position with growth potential through increased transparency and digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. The use of Matomo analytics suggests some privacy awareness, but missing cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies present compliance risks under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Enhancing security headers, formalizing privacy and incident response policies, and auditing third-party scripts would strengthen the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information and establish a vulnerability disclosure process.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Teo via nadační fond
Registration number
14001543
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teo via nadační fond
Description
Nadační fond (foundation) focused on sustainable financing and support of church congregations, parishes, communities, and church institutions. Their mission is to enable clergy to focus on spiritual accompaniment and to support economically independent congregations with active lay participation.
Key services
Sustainable financing for church congregations and parishes, Support for church groups and Christian organizations, Promotion of active lay participation in church activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.6.1, FontAwesome, Owl Carousel, Matomo Analytics, Google Fonts, Google Translate Widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external scripts with crossorigin attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Google Fonts, Google Translate
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is partially available but no direct emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Use of Matomo analytics indicates some privacy-conscious tracking but no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies but lacks some security headers.
  6. Content is focused on non-profit church support activities with no adult or questionable content.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, supporting legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern frontend stack with jQuery, Bootstrap 4.6.1, FontAwesome, and Owl Carousel for UI components. It uses Matomo for analytics, indicating a preference for privacy-friendly tracking. Hosting is via a Czech registrar and name servers consistent with the region. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts and Google Translate for multilingual support. However, the lack of advanced SEO tags and accessibility features suggests technical debt. The CMS is IS OMNIA, a specialized system for parish management. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teovia.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teovia.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.