Skip to main content

Security report for telraam.net

Transportation · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Telraam is a specialized technology company offering AI-powered, privacy-friendly traffic counting devices and data services for various transport modes including pedestrians, cyclists, cars, and heavy vehicles. The company provides both indoor and outdoor models, complemented by an intuitive dashboard and an open API for data integration. Their market position is niche, targeting citizens, municipalities, and urban planners interested in mobility data. The website employs a modern technical infrastructure with popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Leaflet for mapping, Chart.js for data visualization, and Luxon/Moment for date-time handling. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating gaps in privacy compliance. Contact is primarily via a contact form, with no direct emails or phone numbers visible. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to enhance security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching telraam.net

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
73
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Telraam operates in the transportation and technology sectors, focusing on smart traffic counting solutions. Their business model combines hardware sales with data subscription and platform services, targeting municipalities, urban planners, and citizen scientists. The company appears small-sized, founded in 2018, with a consistent brand and good content quality. Their partnership ecosystem includes official FAQ and talks subdomains, supporting community engagement. Growth indicators include multilingual support and open API availability, positioning them well in the niche smart mobility market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are detected. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved to meet GDPR and NIS2 standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
AI-powered, privacy-friendly traffic counters for pedestrians, cyclists, cars, and heavy vehicles — available in both indoor and outdoor models. Includes an intuitive dashboard and an open API for easy integration.
Key services
Traffic counting devices, Data dashboard, Open API for data integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Leaflet 1.3.3 and 1.6.0, Chart.js 3.7, Luxon 1.26.0, Moment.js, Trumbowyg editor, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and mapping tools (Leaflet).
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided content.
  3. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  5. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Website is well-structured with clear navigation and multilingual support.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack including jQuery, Leaflet for interactive maps, Chart.js for data visualization, and Luxon/Moment for date-time management. The presence of Trumbowyg editor and Fancybox indicates rich content editing and media display capabilities. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. No CMS or hosting provider was identified, suggesting a custom or lightweight backend. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with telraam.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review telraam.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.