Skip to main content

Security report for telegram.im

Telegram.im · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Telegram.im operates as an unofficial service providing Telegram button widgets and logo generation tools for website owners and developers. The service targets users who want to integrate Telegram contact options on their websites, promoting Telegram channels, bots, and facilitating user engagement. The website is small-scale and niche-focused, with no official affiliation to Telegram Messenger. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Mobirise framework, hosted on name.com nameservers. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with a good user experience and clear navigation. Security posture is basic; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers or vulnerability disclosures are present. Privacy compliance is minimal but includes a privacy policy and cookie consent modal. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, only a contact/report link for illegal content. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of telegram.im. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching telegram.im

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Telegram.im occupies a niche market providing Telegram integration widgets for websites. Its business model is free service provision, likely monetized indirectly or as a value-added tool for Telegram users. The site promotes partner services such as apps2.me and getbtn.com, indicating a small ecosystem of related offerings. The lack of official Telegram affiliation and minimal business information limits its credibility but also reduces regulatory burden. The target audience is webmasters and developers seeking Telegram contact solutions. Growth indicators include usage statistics displayed on the site. The partnership ecosystem is limited but relevant to the widget service niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy is published, and no incident response contacts are explicitly provided beyond a general contact/report link. The absence of exposed sensitive data and secure form inputs is positive. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a low-risk widget service but requiring improvements to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by expanding the privacy policy and cookie consent details to meet GDPR standards.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and customer support.
  5. Review and vet external linked domains, especially suspicious ones like xn--r1a.website, to ensure user safety.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Telegram.im
Description
Telegram.im provides an unofficial instant messaging Telegram button widget service for websites, allowing webmasters to add Telegram contact buttons, generate logos, and promote Telegram channels and bots.
Key services
Telegram button widget generation, Logo generation for Telegram, Channel widget promotion, Knowledge base and mini apps links
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap 3.3.4, jQuery 1.11.2, Font Awesome 4.3.0, Google Fonts, Mobirise framework, Jarallax (parallax effect), Masonry layout, Spectrum color picker
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Mobirise
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent modal implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an unofficial Telegram button widget service
  2. No official affiliation with Telegram Messenger
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found
  4. Privacy policy and cookie consent implemented but basic
  5. No terms of service found
  6. No explicit security policy or vulnerability disclosure
  7. Uses common web technologies and frameworks
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Some external domains appear suspicious (xn--r1a.website) and should be reviewed
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a solid foundation of common web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Mobirise framework, ensuring responsive design and moderate performance. Hosting is via name.com nameservers, indicating a standard hosting environment. The site uses external resources from Google Fonts and CDNJS for fonts and scripts. Performance is moderate with some modern features like parallax effects and masonry layouts. Technical debt appears low but the absence of advanced security headers and modern security practices indicates room for modernization. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. SEO is adequately addressed with meta tags and alternate language links.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with telegram.im. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review telegram.im.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.