Skip to main content

Security report for tekoo.cz

Tekoo spol. s r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tekoo spol. s r.o. is a Czech medium-sized wholesale supplier specializing in fresh fruit and vegetables. As a member of the Bidfood group, it holds a strong market position serving a diverse clientele including retail stores, e-shops, catering services, hospitals, and senior homes. The company offers a broad product range and value-added services such as customized packaging and electronic data interchange for orders and invoices. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its target audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates common marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook SDK. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, though additional security headers could enhance protection. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy but does not detract from the business credibility demonstrated on the site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tekoo.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
57
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tekoo operates in the retail sector with a wholesale distribution business model supported by a robust logistics fleet of 60 delivery vehicles. Its membership in the Bidfood group provides strategic advantages and market reach. The company targets institutional clients such as schools, hospitals, and hospitality businesses, as well as retail and e-commerce channels. The website's content and linked domains indicate a well-established partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include a sizable employee base and long market presence. The company leverages digital tools for order management and customer engagement, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses common third-party scripts including Google Analytics and Facebook SDK, which require ongoing monitoring for privacy compliance. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with recommendations to enhance header configurations and conduct regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  3. Publish clear security policy and incident response procedures to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to reduce risk of vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tekoo spol. s r.o.
VAT number
CZ41601513
Registration number
41601513
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tekoo spol. s r.o.
Description
Velkoobchodní dodavatel čerstvého ovoce a zeleniny, člen skupiny Bidfood, nabízí široký sortiment zboží, vlastní logistiku s 60 rozvozovými auty, dopravu zdarma po Moravě a západním Slovensku, a služby jako balení, krájení a vakuování zboží.
Key services
Dodávky ovoce a zeleniny, Logistika a rozvoz, Příprava zboží dle přání (balení, krájení, vakuování), Elektronická výměna dat (objednávky, faktury, dodací listy), E-shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Everest Forms, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and several plugins.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and physical address.
  6. Business is a medium-sized wholesale supplier in the retail sector.
  7. No critical security issues detected but security headers could be improved.
  8. Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are used for tracking.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building, supported by plugins such as Everest Forms and Sticky Menu. It integrates Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with potential optimization opportunities in script loading and caching. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were identified. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses standard SEO practices and includes structured data for enhanced search engine understanding.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 45/100High35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tekoo.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tekoo.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.