Skip to main content

Security report for teknologisk.dk

Teknologisk institut · Information technology and services · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

49/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

4 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
3of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teknologisk.dk

This scan found 10 issues across 2 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Security headers
15
GDPR outside view
83
Average
49

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention teknologisk.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
93
Employees
0
Customers
92
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
60%

14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for teknologisk.dk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institute holds a leading position in the Danish technology sector, serving a broad audience including businesses and the workforce. Its business model revolves around research, consultancy, standardization, and education, generating value through knowledge transfer and societal development projects. The presence of multiple marketing and analytics partners suggests active engagement in digital outreach and user behavior analysis. The domain and WHOIS data confirm legitimacy and consistency with the institute's institutional identity. The website's content and structure support a professional image, though direct contact details and terms of service are lacking, which may affect user engagement and legal clarity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and use of anti-forgery cookies. The detailed cookie consent banner categorizes cookies by purpose and lists third-party processors with privacy policy links, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Security headers were not explicitly identified in the provided data, suggesting potential enhancement opportunities. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment suitable for its institutional role but could benefit from formalizing security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party integrations and cookie management to maintain compliance and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teknologisk Institut
Description
Teknologisk Institut udvikler, anvender og formidler forsknings- og teknologibaseret viden til dansk erhvervsliv. Instituttet deltager i samfundsnyttige udviklingsprojekter i tæt samarbejde med førende forsknings- og uddannelsesinstitutioner i både Danmark og udlandet. Teknologisk Institut gennemfører rådgivnings- og standardiseringsaktiviteter, som bidrager til en dynamisk og harmonisk samfundsudvikling. Instituttet medvirker til at styrke den danske arbejdsstyrkes kompetencer via uddannelse.
Key services
Research and technology knowledge development, Consultancy and advisory services, Standardization activities, Education and workforce competence development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, Modernizr 2.8.3, Google Tag Manager, CookieInformation consent management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed categories
  • Use of anti-forgery cookies (.AspNetCore.Antiforgeryxxx)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ontame.io, Quantcast
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Marketing Platform, Criteo, LinkedIn, Mediavine, Amobee, Nativo, BidSwitch
Tracking pixels
Quantcast, Ontame.io, TikTok, Scratcher
Marketing tools
Sleeknote, ClickDimensions
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed categories and third-party processors
  2. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics services
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage HTML
  4. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages detected
  5. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teknologisk.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teknologisk.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.