Skip to main content

Security report for technava.gr

Technava S.A. · Transportation · Greece

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Technava S.A. is a well-established Greek company founded in 1968, specializing in the supply, installation, and servicing of shipbuilding and industrial equipment. It serves a broad clientele including the Greek Shipping Industry and various industrial sectors such as power plants and oilfield industries. The company maintains a medium-sized workforce of highly skilled engineers and positions itself as a leading supplier and service provider in its market segment. The website reflects a professional digital presence with clear navigation, comprehensive service descriptions, and multilingual support. Technava demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations through detailed privacy and cookie policies and employs modern web technologies including WordPress, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics purposes. The presence of ISO 9001:2015 certification further reinforces its commitment to quality and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching technava.gr

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Technava operates primarily in the transportation and industrial equipment sectors, targeting shipping companies and industrial clients. Its business model revolves around equipment supply, technical support, and after-sales services, complemented by training and consulting offerings. The company leverages partnerships, such as with Casstechnava for shipbroking services, to expand its market reach. The website's content and structure indicate a mature business with a focus on customer satisfaction and quality assurance. The firm’s digital ecosystem includes social media engagement and a well-maintained blog for press releases, supporting its market visibility and customer engagement strategies.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, offering granular control to users. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the web application against common attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response information is not explicitly provided, which could be enhanced to improve security readiness and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact details or a security policy page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet international standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect any changes in data processing or regulatory requirements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Technava S.A.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Technava S.A.
Description
Technava S.A. is one of the leading companies in the supply, installation and service of Shipbuilding & Industrial equipment. Founded in 1968, it serves the Greek Shipping Industry and industrial sectors including power plants, municipalities, and oilfield industry.
Key services
Marine Equipment, New Building, Marine Coatings, Service Station & Field Services, Yachting, Spare Parts & Stock Holdings, After Sales, Dry Docks, ShipBroking, Training Center
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo Player API
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are implemented.
  3. Multiple service offerings clearly presented with detailed navigation.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Presence of ISO 9001:2015 certification enhances trust.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  7. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  8. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. It utilizes jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for traffic analysis. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes multilingual support via WPML. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities in loading speed and accessibility. The technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence suitable for a medium-sized enterprise in the industrial and transportation sectors.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with technava.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review technava.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.