Skip to main content

Security report for teampaprecarkea.com

Team PAPREC ARKÉA · Transportation · France

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Team PAPREC ARKÉA is a French offshore sailing team prominently preparing for the Vendée Globe 2024-2025 race, sponsored by Paprec and Arkéa. The website serves as an official platform to share news, media, and team information, targeting sailing enthusiasts and sports fans. The business model revolves around sponsorship and promotion within competitive sailing circuits. Technically, the site employs modern web standards, including responsive design, accessibility features, and structured data, ensuring a good user experience across devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent management, though improvements in security headers and explicit incident response information are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy, but the professional presentation and active social media presence support the site's credibility. Overall, the site is well-maintained, compliant with privacy regulations, and effectively supports the team's branding and communication objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teampaprecarkea.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The team operates in the transportation sector, specifically competitive offshore sailing, with a small-sized organizational footprint. Their market position is strengthened by notable victories and long-term sponsorships from Paprec and Arkéa, indicating stable financial backing and brand recognition. The website reflects a focused business model centered on event participation and sponsor visibility. The partnership ecosystem is clearly defined, with dedicated partner pages and logos. Growth indicators include active media updates and social engagement. However, the lack of direct contact information and incomplete WHOIS data may limit some business transparency aspects.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism via tarteaucitron, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of Google Analytics is managed with user consent, aligning with privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for enhancement in header implementation and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add explicit company contact details such as email and phone numbers to increase trust and facilitate communication.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Team PAPREC ARKÉA
Description
Team PAPREC ARKÉA is a sailing team preparing for the Vendée Globe 2024-2025 with skipper Yoann Richomme aboard the IMOCA 60 PAPREC ARKÉA. The team is sponsored by Paprec and Arkéa, focusing on offshore racing.
Key services
Competitive offshore sailing, Event participation, Sponsorship promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Slick Carousel, SVG icons, JSON-LD
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management via tarteaucitron

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
tarteaucitron consent manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French language.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  6. Social media presence is strong with official accounts on major platforms.
  7. Site uses modern web technologies and good accessibility features.
  8. Security headers are not explicitly detected; improvement recommended.
  9. Google Analytics is used with user consent management.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, utilizing libraries such as Slick Carousel for media sliders and SVG icons for graphics. JSON-LD structured data is implemented for SEO benefits. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with an accessibility widget integrated via an external script. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly identified. The site uses modern meta tags and social media integration for enhanced visibility. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking, representing a technical risk. Opportunities exist to improve performance and security through header enhancements and potential CMS adoption for easier content management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teampaprecarkea.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teampaprecarkea.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.