Skip to main content

Security report for tatestevenson.com

Tate Stevenson Architects Ltd · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tate Stevenson Architects Ltd is a small architectural firm based in Moira, Northern Ireland, specializing in commercial, industrial, educational, private housing, and social housing developments. The company targets clients in Northern Ireland seeking professional architectural services. The website is built on the Wix platform, featuring a professional design with good mobile optimization and basic SEO. Technical infrastructure relies on Wix hosting and standard JavaScript libraries, including Sentry for error monitoring. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and business information appear consistent and professional. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile with recommendations to improve privacy policies, security headers, and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tatestevenson.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector providing architectural services with a focus on various building types. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting local clients in Northern Ireland. The website reflects a consistent brand and professional presence but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the domain analysis. The firm appears to maintain a modest digital footprint with limited marketing or analytics tools beyond basic error tracking. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not publicly visible. Strategic opportunities include enhancing digital trust through improved compliance and security measures.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Incident response and security contact information are absent. The use of third-party scripts like Sentry is noted but without clear data protection disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is basic, suitable for a small business but requiring enhancements to meet modern compliance standards and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure transparency and legitimacy of domain ownership.
  4. Include terms of service and incident response contact details to enhance trust and preparedness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tate Stevenson Architects Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tate Stevenson Architects Ltd
Description
Tate Stevenson Architects based in Moira, Belfast, N. Ireland. Commercial, industrial, educational, private housing developments along with social housing
Key services
Commercial architectural design, Industrial architectural design, Educational building design, Private housing developments, Social housing projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, Sentry (error monitoring), Core-js polyfills
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry (error monitoring)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets
  2. No visible contact forms on the main page HTML provided
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. Contact phone and address are present in structured data
  5. No email addresses or social media links explicitly found in HTML
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. HTTPS is enabled and used
  8. No signs of malware or phishing detected
  9. Content is professional and relevant to architectural services
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Wix, leveraging its platform and content management system. It uses standard JavaScript polyfills and Sentry for error monitoring. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA and focus management but room for improvement. SEO is basic with meta tags and structured data but lacks advanced optimization. The technical stack is modern but limited by the Wix platform constraints. Opportunities exist to improve performance, accessibility, and SEO through custom enhancements and better compliance with web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tatestevenson.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tatestevenson.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.