Skip to main content

Security report for tarom.ro

Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.tarom.ro currently presents a service unavailable message due to rate limiting or a Web Application Firewall (WAF) blocking access, returning an HTTP 429 Too Many Requests error. This prevents access to any meaningful content, metadata, or business information. The domain is a Romanian national airline domain, but WHOIS data is not publicly available due to ROTLD privacy policies. The lack of accessible content and metadata limits the ability to assess the company's digital maturity or security posture in detail. Technically, the site appears to be protected by generic rate limiting or WAF mechanisms, but no specific security headers or SSL configuration details are visible. The absence of privacy, cookie, or security policies on the accessible page indicates compliance gaps. No contact information or business details are available from the provided content. From a security perspective, the site is currently inaccessible for analysis, which is a critical issue for user experience and trust. The domain registration appears legitimate but privacy-protected, which is common for ROTLD domains. Overall, the website's current state poses a risk for user trust and operational continuity due to unavailability and lack of visible security and compliance information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tarom.ro

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content, detailed business intelligence is unavailable. The domain corresponds to TAROM, the Romanian national airline, indicating a transportation sector business. The absence of visible business information, contact details, or policies on the site limits insights into market positioning, competitive advantages, or operational strategies. The domain's ROTLD privacy protection is standard for Romanian domains but restricts registrant visibility. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the content.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the site's inaccessibility and minimal content. The presence of a rate limiting or WAF mechanism suggests some level of protection against abuse or attacks. However, no security headers or HTTPS confirmation are visible, and no vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are found. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators cannot be evaluated.

Recommendations

  1. Investigate and optimize WAF and rate limiting configurations to prevent legitimate user access issues.
  2. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and security headers are implemented to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels for transparency and support.
  5. Regularly monitor and audit website availability and security to maintain operational continuity and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The page shows a 'Service unavailable' message with HTTP 429 Too Many Requests error, indicating rate limiting or WAF blocking. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to rate limiting or WAF blocking.
  2. No metadata, structured data, or scripts detected due to minimal HTML content.
  3. No contact information, policies, or business details available on the page.
  4. WHOIS data is not disclosed publicly by ROTLD, limiting domain ownership verification.
  5. No external links or social media links found in the provided HTML.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from the content.
  7. The website is likely protected by a rate limiting mechanism or generic WAF.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves a minimal HTML page indicating service unavailability due to too many requests, likely caused by rate limiting or a generic WAF. No metadata, scripts, or structured data are present. The technology stack, CMS, hosting provider, and performance characteristics cannot be determined. The lack of accessible content and technical details suggests potential technical debt or misconfiguration impacting user experience and SEO. Modernization and improved error handling are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tarom.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tarom.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.