Skip to main content

Security report for tappcoalition.eu

True Animal Protein Price Coalition · Non-profit · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The True Animal Protein Price Coalition is a small non-profit organization dedicated to advocating for fair pricing and taxation policies to promote sustainable production and consumption of meat and dairy products. Their market position is niche, targeting policymakers, environmental advocates, and consumers interested in sustainable food systems. The website provides key services such as organizing events, publishing reports, and distributing newsletters to support their advocacy efforts. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA, and Google Tag Manager, hosted under a reputable registrar. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA for form protection, and implements a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a good security posture. However, it lacks explicit security headers and publicly available security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, and GDPR compliance indicators are present. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe, with no adult or questionable content. The domain registration is consistent with the organization's claims, and no suspicious patterns were found. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and improving incident response transparency to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tappcoalition.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tappcoalition.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for tappcoalition.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit focused on sustainable animal protein pricing, leveraging advocacy and policy influence as its primary business model. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on true pricing for meat and dairy, positioning itself as a thought leader in this niche. Revenue streams likely include donations and grants, supported by a small but active partnership and social media ecosystem. The target customer segments include policymakers, environmental NGOs, and conscious consumers. Growth indicators include active event participation and regular publication of reports and newsletters. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and possibly other sustainability-focused organizations, though no explicit partners were listed on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with a consent mechanism, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers and a public security policy or incident response contact reduces overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified. The organization should consider formalizing its security policies and incident response processes to improve readiness and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Develop a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
True Animal Protein Price Coalition
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
True Animal Protein Price Coalition
Description
The True Animal Protein Price Coalition (TAPP Coalition) is a non-profit foundation focused on fair prices and taxes to make the production and consumption of meat and dairy more sustainable.
Key services
Advocacy for fair pricing and taxation, Organizing events and press conferences, Publishing reports and policy proposals, Newsletter distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, MyOnline Company CMS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support.
  2. Strong focus on transparency with privacy and cookie policies.
  3. Active social media presence linked in header and footer.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices like HTTPS and reCAPTCHA.
  5. No evidence of security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and Google services for analytics and bot protection. It is hosted under a reputable registrar with SSL/TLS properly configured, ensuring secure connections. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for local business. The site is built on the MyOnline Company CMS platform, which provides standard content management capabilities. Opportunities exist to improve technical security configurations and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tappcoalition.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tappcoalition.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.