Skip to main content

Security report for tanagra.lt

JSC "Tanagra" · Transportation · Lithuania

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JSC Tanagra is a Lithuanian company specializing in the supply and distribution of automotive spare parts and related services, including a network of workshops and technical assistance on the road. The company targets automotive service centers, spare parts stores, wholesale buyers, and end customers. Their business model combines wholesale and retail sales with an online order management system to streamline parts procurement. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand presence and established supplier partnerships. Technically, the site is built on Joomla CMS, uses common analytics and social media integrations, and enforces HTTPS for secure communications. However, it lacks some modern security headers and comprehensive privacy documentation. The security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though WHOIS data unavailability limits full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tanagra.lt

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tanagra holds a solid position in the Lithuanian automotive parts market, leveraging partnerships with well-known European suppliers and offering a broad range of products including TSP branded parts. Their business model focuses on wholesale distribution complemented by retail and technical support services. The presence of an online order system indicates digital maturity and customer convenience focus. The company maintains active social media engagement and provides clear contact information, enhancing customer trust. Growth potential exists through expanding product ranges and improving digital marketing and compliance practices.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting basic compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure program is evident. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook SDK introduces moderate tracking but no overt vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a security policy and incident response contact to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience across devices.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and CMS components to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JSC "Tanagra"
VAT number
LT100000012511
Registration number
222042160
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JSC "Tanagra"
Description
Supplier and service provider of car parts and service centers, offering wholesale and retail automotive spare parts, technical assistance, and order management systems.
Key services
Car parts supply, Workshop network, Technical assistance on the road, Wholesale distribution, Online order management system (Tanagra ORDER)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses Joomla CMS with standard third-party scripts for analytics and social media.
  4. Cookie consent banner present with user interaction mechanism.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. Contact information including company email, phone numbers, and physical address clearly displayed.
  7. Multiple supplier and partner logos indicate established business relationships.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source; HTTPS is enforced.
  9. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the homepage.
  10. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook like button and Facebook SDK.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Joomla CMS with jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and social media features. The site loads with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO is supported by meta tags and alternate language links but could be improved with structured data and enhanced accessibility features. No hosting provider details were found in the HTML. The site uses standard CSS and JavaScript files with no apparent technical debt or errors visible in the source. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve performance and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tanagra.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tanagra.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.