Skip to main content

Security report for tamarshipman.com

Tamar Ship Management Ltd. · Transportation · Hong Kong

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tamar Ship Management Ltd. is a Hong Kong-based maritime service provider managing a fleet of 42 handy size and supramax dry bulk vessels. The company offers a range of ship management services including crew management, technical management, project management, commercial operations, dry docking, compliance, vessel inspection, and insurance management. Their website reflects a medium-sized, established business with a professional online presence and clear contact information targeting shipowners and maritime stakeholders globally. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing common technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The site is hosted with DNS managed by Cloudflare and registered through WebNic.cc. Performance and mobile optimization are good, with SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers. The customer portal login mechanism is a security concern due to password transmission in URL parameters. No explicit privacy, cookie, or security policies are published, indicating compliance gaps. The WHOIS data is consistent and domain age supports legitimacy. Overall, Tamar Ship Management's website is professional and credible but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance improvements, and safer authentication methods to reduce risk and improve trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tamarshipman.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tamar Ship Management operates in the transportation sector, focusing on ship management services for dry bulk vessels. Their competitive advantage lies in personalized, bespoke services and a transparent management style. The company has a global operational footprint with 952 port calls in 93 countries in 2021, indicating strong market presence. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts with shipowners. The company maintains active social media channels and partners with a web design firm (Turtle Media). Growth indicators include a stable fleet size and ongoing service diversification. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in enhancing digital security and compliance to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration. However, the absence of DNSSEC, lack of security headers, and insecure login form implementation are notable vulnerabilities. No public incident response or security policies are available, which limits transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in secure coding practices and policy publication. Business impact of current vulnerabilities includes potential credential exposure and reduced user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Redesign the customer portal login to use secure POST requests without exposing passwords in URLs.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tamar Ship Management Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tamar Ship Management Ltd.
Description
Tamar Ship Management manages a fleet of 42 handy size & supramax dry bulk vessels ranging from 28-56k dwt. They provide bespoke and personal ship management services including crew management, technical management, project management, commercial operations management, dry docking services, compliance, vessel inspection, and insurance placement & claims management.
Key services
Crew Management, Technical Management, Project Management, Commercial Operations Management, Dry Docking Services, Compliance – Marine, Safety & Security Services, Vessel Inspection, Insurance Placement & Claims Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Cloudflare (DNS and likely CDN)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Customer portal login uses insecure method passing password in URL.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  6. Uses Google Analytics with MonsterInsights plugin.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled for domain.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery and Google services for analytics and security. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly using Yoast SEO. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. However, technical debt is indicated by outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) and lack of advanced accessibility features. Modernization opportunities include upgrading libraries, enhancing accessibility, and improving security configurations to reduce technical risks impacting business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tamarshipman.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tamarshipman.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.