Skip to main content

Security report for tagforetagen.se

Tågföretagen · Transportation · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tågföretagen is a Swedish industry and employer organization representing approximately 70 train companies with 17,000 employees. The website serves as a professional platform providing news, events, member resources, and advocacy information focused on sustainable transportation and railway infrastructure in Sweden. The organization positions itself as a key stakeholder in the Swedish railway sector, promoting industry interests and competence development. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and CookieHub for cookie consent management. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data for the exact domain queried is missing, likely due to querying the 'www.' subdomain, which slightly reduces trustworthiness but does not detract from the professional appearance and content quality. Overall, the site is safe, compliant with basic privacy mechanisms, and serves its business purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tagforetagen.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as an important industry association within the transportation sector, specifically focusing on the railway industry in Sweden. It provides advocacy, information dissemination, and member services including events and training. The website reflects a medium-sized entity with a clear target audience of railway companies and stakeholders. Partnerships with Almega and Arbetsgivarguiden indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The business model is based on membership and industry representation rather than direct commercial sales. The site content and structure support ongoing engagement with members and the public, reinforcing its market position as a key industry voice.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance security transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and CookieHub is standard but should be monitored for updates and security. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy page on the website.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add explicit security incident response contact information and consider publishing a security.txt file.
  4. Ensure all third-party scripts and plugins are regularly updated and monitored for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing detailed cookie and data retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tågföretagen
Description
Tåg­företagen är en bransch- och arbetsgivarorganisation för tågföretag. Tåg­företagen har cirka 70 medlemsföretag med 17 000 anställda.
Key services
Industry advocacy, Information dissemination, Member services, Events and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub, Cloudflare (implied by cookies)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional industry association site for Swedish train companies.
  2. Content is in Swedish and well structured with news, events, and member resources.
  3. No WHOIS data found for the full domain queried, possibly due to querying 'www.' subdomain instead of base domain.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented via CookieHub.
  5. No explicit privacy policy page found in the provided content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit contact phone numbers found; only email and contact page links.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices observed.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with the Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager integration. Cookie consent is managed via CookieHub. The site uses modern web fonts from Google Fonts and is mobile responsive with good accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. No hosting provider details were explicitly found. The site structure and meta tags are well implemented for SEO. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tagforetagen.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tagforetagen.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.