Skip to main content

Security report for tagea.app

Tremaze GmbH · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tremaze GmbH is a German-based company specializing in digital software solutions tailored for social work organizations. Their flagship product, Tagea, integrates communication, documentation, and administrative functions into a unified platform designed to streamline workflows for social institutions. The company targets social sector organizations, offering a SaaS model that supports internal and external communication, appointment management, and integration with existing systems. Their market position is niche but well-defined, serving a critical need in the social services domain. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics, and Cookie-Script for consent management. Hosting is provided by Hetzner, a reputable German hosting provider, ensuring data residency within Germany. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, reflecting a mature digital presence. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and incorporates privacy-conscious features such as IP anonymization in analytics and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the WHOIS or site content. Overall, Tremaze GmbH presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with strong compliance to GDPR and privacy standards. The risk profile is low, but enhancing transparency around security policies and incident management would further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tagea.app

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tremaze GmbH operates in the specialized niche of digital solutions for social work, addressing the unique needs of social institutions for integrated communication and documentation. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a unified platform that replaces fragmented tools, reducing operational complexity and costs. The business model is SaaS-based, targeting small to medium-sized social organizations in Germany, with potential for expansion. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for the Tagea platform. The company maintains partnerships with recognized social organizations such as Diakonie and Caritas, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators include recent corporate restructuring (UG to GmbH) and active content marketing via blogs and case studies. The partnership ecosystem includes HubSpot for meetings and Hetzner for hosting. Strategic observations suggest a focus on compliance, user-centric design, and integration capabilities to maintain market relevance.

Security posture

The security maturity of Tremaze GmbH is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and employs privacy-respecting analytics configurations. The presence of a cookie consent banner with granular options indicates GDPR awareness. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The company states that data is hosted exclusively in Germany with data processing agreements, which is positive for compliance. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, suggesting an opportunity to improve external communication of security practices. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by publishing relevant policies and implementing additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information and establish a vulnerability disclosure program.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase transparency around data protection officer contact details and compliance certifications.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tremaze GmbH
Description
Tremaze offers digital software solutions for social work, focusing on communication, documentation, and administration for social institutions and organizations.
Key services
Communication platform, Documentation tools, Administration management, Integration with existing systems, Mobile apps for internal and external communication
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookie-Script consent management, jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web, Mobile apps (implied)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • Data processing agreements mentioned

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot meetings integration
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at social sector organizations.
  3. Strong focus on GDPR compliance and data privacy.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and consent management.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. Contact information is primarily phone and contact form; no emails publicly listed.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter.
  8. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and scalable infrastructure using Webflow CMS, hosted by Hetzner in Germany, ensuring compliance with data residency requirements. The technology stack includes jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookie-Script for consent management, reflecting a mature digital marketing and analytics setup. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses responsive design and includes multimedia content such as videos and images optimized for various screen sizes. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of advanced security headers and incident response mechanisms indicates areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tagea.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tagea.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.