Skip to main content

Security report for tagdeliver.com

Content Ignite · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Content Ignite operates as a responsible advertising technology provider focusing on delivering ads that comply with industry standards such as those set by the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB). The company emphasizes user privacy by offering opt-out mechanisms for personalized advertising, targeting advertisers and privacy-conscious internet users. The website content is professionally presented with a clear focus on privacy and advertising transparency, although contact details and comprehensive cookie policies are not prominently provided. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 4.3.1 and JavaScript Fetch API to dynamically load branding and user consent data from APIs hosted on DigitalOcean infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and hosted on DigitalOcean, indicating a stable and professional infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and client-side consent management but lacks visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism. No forms or sensitive data collection points were detected on the analyzed page, reducing immediate risk. The WHOIS data shows consistent domain registration with appropriate domain age and no privacy protection, supporting legitimacy. However, improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and contact transparency are recommended. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with good privacy compliance and business credibility but could enhance security posture and user trust by addressing identified gaps.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tagdeliver.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Content Ignite positions itself in the digital advertising technology sector with a niche focus on responsible and privacy-conscious advertising. The business model revolves around providing ad delivery services that comply with IAB guidelines and offer user controls for ad personalization. The target market includes advertisers, publishers, and end-users concerned about privacy. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2016, with no public parent or subsidiary affiliations. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized industry bodies like the IAB and privacy platforms such as YourOnlineChoices. Revenue streams likely derive from advertising technology services and possibly data-driven ad placements. Growth indicators are not explicit but the use of modern APIs and dynamic branding suggests ongoing development and market adaptation.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is moderate. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communications, and client-side mechanisms allow users to opt out of personalized ads, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. The lack of cookie consent banners may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security culture appears nascent but with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a clear cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and APIs to ensure no vulnerable libraries or data leakage.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Content Ignite
Description
Content Ignite provides responsible advertising services adhering to Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) guidelines, focusing on privacy-conscious ad delivery and user opt-out personalization options.
Key services
Personalized advertising, Ad delivery management, User consent and opt-out mechanisms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.3.1, JavaScript Fetch API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by external resources
  • Client-side opt-out consent management

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Content Ignite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides clear information about advertising and privacy practices.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the page.
  3. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  4. Uses modern frontend technologies and external APIs for dynamic content.
  5. Domain is well maintained with no DNSSEC enabled.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No forms collecting personal data on the analyzed page.
  8. External links mostly to trusted advertising and privacy organizations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Bootstrap 4.3.1 for responsive design and uses JavaScript Fetch API calls to dynamically load branding and user consent data from its own API endpoints hosted on DigitalOcean. The domain uses GoDaddy as registrar with DNS hosted on DigitalOcean name servers. The site lacks DNSSEC which could improve DNS security. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization detected. SEO and accessibility are basic, with minimal meta tags and no ARIA roles or landmarks observed. No CMS or backend platform is identified from the HTML content. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tagdeliver.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tagdeliver.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.