Skip to main content

Security report for tablerstiftung.de

Stiftung Round Table Deutschland · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stiftung Round Table Deutschland is a German non-profit foundation established in 2006, dedicated to supporting social projects such as child and youth promotion, healthcare, aid for needy people, and disaster relief. It operates closely with Round Table Deutschland, leveraging a network of thousands of volunteers to implement service projects efficiently. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear donation information and contact points, targeting donors, members, and partner organizations. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies like Bootstrap and jQuery, is mobile-optimized, and employs HTTPS with basic security practices. However, it lacks explicit security headers and incident response documentation. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policies are found. Overall, the site is trustworthy, safe, and well-suited for its non-profit mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tablerstiftung.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tablerstiftung.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for tablerstiftung.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a solid position in the German non-profit sector, benefiting from the established Round Table network. Its business model relies on donations and partnerships, including the possibility for donors to create named sub-foundations. The target audience includes socially conscious individuals, other foundations, and local clubs. The website's transparency in governance and donation handling enhances credibility. The lack of phone or physical address contact details may limit some user trust but is mitigated by email contacts and social media presence. No commercial advertising or tracking is evident, aligning with the non-profit ethos.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses email obfuscation to protect contact information. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are published, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the site against attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
  4. Consider adding phone and physical address contact details to increase trust and accessibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party libraries and scripts to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stiftung Round Table Deutschland
Description
Die Stiftung Round Table Deutschland ist eine gemeinnützige Stiftung, die soziale Projekte unterstützt, insbesondere in den Bereichen Kinder- und Jugendförderung, Gesundheitsversorgung, Hilfe für hilfsbedürftige Menschen und Katastrophenhilfe. Sie wurde 2006 gegründet und ist eng mit Round Table Deutschland verbunden, einem Service-Club mit ehrenamtlichen Mitgliedern.
Key services
Förderung sozialer Projekte, Unterstützung des Nationalen Serviceprojekts von Round Table Deutschland, Ermöglichung von Unterstiftungen, Katastrophenhilfe
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Plyr (video player), OpenStreetMap Leaflet
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Email obfuscation script used

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at German-speaking audiences.
  3. No forms detected on the main page; contact is via email links.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram.
  6. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, FontAwesome for icons, and Plyr for video playback. OpenStreetMap Leaflet is included but not evidently used on the main page. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears custom or niche based on asset paths. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and canonical links. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tablerstiftung.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tablerstiftung.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.