Skip to main content

Security report for t-p.cz

JUDr. Tomáš Philippi · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JUDr. Tomáš Philippi operates a specialized legal practice in the Czech Republic focusing on real estate, civil, commercial, family, and copyright law. The firm is well-established since 2006 and holds a reputable position in the market, notably through contributions to real estate legislation and education. The website serves as a professional portal presenting the firm's services, contact information, and related real estate educational resources. Technically, the website is basic but functional, with minimal modern enhancements and limited mobile optimization. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement and missing security headers, and there are no published privacy or cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is trustworthy but would benefit from improved security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching t-p.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm targets clients requiring comprehensive legal services in real estate and related fields, leveraging its niche expertise and legislative authorship to differentiate itself. Revenue streams likely derive from legal consulting, real estate transaction support, and educational services including authorized exams. The partnership ecosystem includes related real estate portals operated by the same entity, enhancing market reach. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on personalized client engagement. Growth indicators include long domain age and diversified service offerings. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to modernize digital presence and enhance compliance to strengthen competitive positioning.

Security posture

The current security maturity is low to moderate. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes the site to potential interception and clickjacking risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices are minimal, with no privacy or cookie policies, which may expose the firm to GDPR compliance risks. The lack of forms reduces attack surface but also limits client interaction capabilities. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Enhance website design and mobile responsiveness to improve user experience and accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JUDr. Tomáš Philippi
Registration number
66257603
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JUDr. Tomáš Philippi
Description
Advokátní kancelář poskytující veškeré právní služby a poradenství se zaměřením na právo realitní, občanské, obchodní, rodinné a autorské. Spoluautor zákona o realitním zprostředkování a autor komentáře k tomuto zákonu. Provozovatel realitního poradenského portálu a centra realitního vzdělávání.
Key services
Legal services in real estate, civil, commercial, family, and copyright law, Real estate consultancy, Real estate education and authorized examinations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
navrcholu.cz
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
navrcholu.cz
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal services site focused on real estate and related law.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected from provided data.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  5. No forms present that collect user data.
  6. Minimal tracking via a Czech analytics service detected.
  7. Website design is basic but functional and consistent with small law firm branding.
  8. No social media links detected.
  9. No security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS detected. Hosting appears to be with Active24, a Czech provider consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization evident. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. The site lacks modern technical enhancements such as responsive design frameworks or security best practices. Technical debt is moderate due to outdated charset (windows-1250) and absence of HTTPS enforcement. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, improving mobile optimization, and implementing structured data for SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with t-p.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review t-p.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.