Skip to main content

Security report for t-engineering.se

T-Engineering · Transportation · Sweden

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

T-Engineering AB is a Scandinavian development company specializing in control systems and electrification solutions for future mobility. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including electrical architecture development, integration, calibration, validation, and hardware-in-the-loop testing. Their market position is strengthened by their in-house IP and close ties to automotive industry players, including implied association with Dongfeng Motor. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a strong focus on technology and transportation sectors, targeting automotive manufacturers and mobility solution providers. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic but includes a cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy page. Overall, the security posture is sound with no critical vulnerabilities detected, and the domain registration details align well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy. The company maintains active social media channels and provides clear contact information, enhancing trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response and security policies, and maintaining regular security audits to strengthen compliance and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching t-engineering.se

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention t-engineering.se, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for t-engineering.se.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

T-Engineering operates in the transportation and technology sectors, focusing on electrification and control systems for vehicles. Their business model is B2B, providing tailored engineering services and products to automotive manufacturers and mobility providers. The company leverages its own intellectual property and in-house development processes to offer cost-effective and high-quality solutions. Market positioning is strong within Scandinavia, with projects involving advanced technologies such as autonomous driving and 3D-printed race cars. Partnerships, such as with Dongfeng Motor and T-Engineering Performance, indicate a growing ecosystem. The company targets future mobility trends including electric vehicles, autonomous transport, and shared mobility concepts, positioning itself for growth in emerging automotive technologies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for enhancement. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could impact transparency and readiness. The use of WordPress and associated plugins requires ongoing vigilance to prevent vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is basic with GDPR considerations addressed via cookie consent and privacy policy. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and improved header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing clearer GDPR-related disclosures.
  5. Strengthen trust signals by adding certifications, testimonials, or third-party security attestations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
T-ENGINEERING AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
T-Engineering
Description
We are a complete development center for mobility, fully equipped with labs for development and full scale testing of software and electronic control systems.
Key services
Electrical Architecture Development, Electrical Integration, Calibration and Validation, Hardware-in-the-loop Testing, Control Systems Development, Testing and Lab Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor 3.27.3, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, LiteSpeed Cache
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive information about products, services, and company
  3. Social media integration present
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  7. Contact information clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address
  8. Use of modern web technologies and CMS
  9. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Elementor 3.27.3, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager. The use of LiteSpeed Cache suggests performance optimization efforts. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, no explicit hosting provider was identified. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load speed and accessibility. The technical stack is mature and well-maintained, but security best practices could be further enhanced through additional headers and policies. The site architecture supports clear navigation and content delivery, aligning with professional standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with t-engineering.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review t-engineering.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.