Skip to main content

Security report for svunion.lv

SV Union Ltd. · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SV Union Ltd. is a Latvian logistics company specializing in multiple freight transportation modes including trucking, air freight, and sea freight, with additional services such as customs handling and wholesale distribution of medical equipment. The company targets businesses requiring efficient logistics solutions across Europe, Russia, and CIS countries. Their website is professionally designed using WordPress and common plugins, offering a clear presentation of services and contact phone number. However, the absence of contact emails and privacy policies indicates room for improvement in customer engagement and compliance. Technically, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires enhancements in security and privacy compliance to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching svunion.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector with a focus on freight forwarding and logistics services. Their business model combines transport services with wholesale supply of medical equipment, indicating diversified revenue streams. The website content suggests a small-sized enterprise with a growing presence in the Baltic region. Multi-language support (English and Russian) indicates targeting of regional markets including Russia and CIS. The lack of detailed business registration data and contact emails limits full business intelligence. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web vulnerabilities like clickjacking and content injection. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The use of outdated WordPress version (4.8.1) and plugins may pose security risks if not regularly updated. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest stable versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Add visible company contact emails and incident response contacts to improve transparency and customer trust.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SV Union Ltd.
Description
SV Union Ltd. is a modern and rapidly growing logistics company focused on domestic road transport within Europe, transit to/from Russia and CIS countries, cargo handling through customs warehouses in Baltic States, air freight, sea freight via Riga seaport, and additional logistics services. They also offer wholesale medical equipment and other goods from trusted suppliers.
Key services
Trucking, Air freight, Sea freight, Additional logistics services, Wholesale medical equipment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.8.1, PHP, jQuery 1.12.4, LayerSlider plugin, Slider Revolution plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, Go Pricing plugin, WPGlobus plugin, Visual Composer
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for sliders and forms.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected; GDPR compliance likely insufficient.
  5. Contact phone number +371 28315511 is clearly displayed in header areas.
  6. No company contact email found in visible content or forms.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in HTML content.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source; SSL is enabled.
  9. Content is business-focused, safe, and professional.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond WordPress standard plugins.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.8.1 with plugins such as LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, and WPGlobus for multi-language support. The site uses jQuery 1.12.4 and Visual Composer for page building. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. The site lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance features, indicating technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with svunion.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review svunion.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.