Skip to main content

Security report for svr-architects.eu

SVR-ARCHITECTS · Real Estate · Belgium

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SVR-ARCHITECTS is a professional architectural firm based in Belgium specializing in healthcare, research, housing, utility buildings, and interior design. The company targets clients seeking specialized architectural services with a focus on living, work, and well-being environments. Their website reflects a well-structured and professional presence with clear navigation and relevant content showcasing their key services and projects. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and several plugins including SEO and cookie consent tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, though it lacks some compliance documentation such as a privacy policy and terms of service pages. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common and acceptable for this business type, but limits detailed domain age and registrant verification. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching svr-architects.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SVR-ARCHITECTS operates in a niche market of architectural services with a focus on healthcare and real estate sectors. Their business model revolves around providing design and project realization services for various building types including offices, retail, logistics, and interiors. The firm maintains an active online presence with social media integration and SEO optimization, supporting client engagement and marketing efforts. The lack of publicly available company registration or VAT information on the website suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise with a localized market focus. The website content and structure indicate a stable market position with potential for growth through enhanced digital and security practices. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content or linked domains.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the provided content. The lack of a security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The domain WHOIS privacy protection is justified but restricts registrant verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small professional firm but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly update all CMS components, plugins, and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SVR-ARCHITECTS
Description
Architectenbureau Antwerpen, sectoren gezondheidszorg, onderzoek, huisvesting, utiliteit (kantoren, industrie en logistiek, parkeergebouwen, ..) en interieur
Key services
Architectural design, Project realization for living, work and well-being, Healthcare architecture, Laboratories, Housing, Offices, Retail, Relaxation, Mixed-use, Industry
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Divi Theme 4.27.4, jQuery 3.7.1, All in One SEO Pro 4.8.4.1, Final Tiles Grid Gallery, Cookie Notice plugin, Divi Booster plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Divi
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
All in One SEO Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly due to EURid privacy policy
  3. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Divi theme and SEO plugin
  4. Cookie consent is implemented indicating GDPR awareness
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  6. Contact phone number is present but no email explicitly found in visible content
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, Pinterest
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  10. Website content is professional and relevant to architecture sector
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, supported by plugins for SEO, cookie consent, and gallery management. The technology stack includes jQuery and FontAwesome for UI enhancements. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. SEO practices are good with meta tags, canonical links, and structured data (JSON-LD) implemented. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. No critical technical vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content, but security headers are missing which could expose the site to certain risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small architectural firm but has opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with svr-architects.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review svr-architects.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.