Skip to main content

Security report for svgimenesmaja.lv

Biedrība “Svētās Ģimenes Māja” · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Biedrība “Svētās Ģimenes Māja” is a Latvian non-profit organization focused on providing community and family support services. Their offerings include family support programs, volunteer coordination, a day center, and a museum of sacred items. The website targets local community members, families, and volunteers, positioning itself as a trusted local social support entity. The site is built on Joomla CMS with a moderate technical infrastructure, including Bootstrap and jQuery, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, the site lacks some modern security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits full domain trust analysis, but the visible business information and partner logos support legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional, secure with HTTPS, and professionally presented, but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching svgimenesmaja.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, serving community and social support needs in Latvia. Its business model revolves around volunteer engagement, family support programs, and cultural preservation through its museum. The website demonstrates a stable partnership ecosystem with recognized organizations such as Bonifatiuswerk and Renovabis, enhancing its credibility. Revenue streams likely include donations, grants, and community funding. The target customer segments are local families, volunteers, and social service beneficiaries. Growth indicators include active event postings and community engagement. The website's partnership ecosystem and social media presence indicate a well-connected organization with a focus on community impact.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, limiting transparency in security management. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries visibly, but regular updates and security hardening are recommended. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the organization to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all third-party libraries to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Biedrība “Svētās Ģimenes Māja”
Registration number
40008172864
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biedrība “Svētās Ģimenes Māja”
Description
Non-profit organization providing community support services including family support programs, volunteer activities, day center services, and a museum of sacred items.
Key services
Family support programs, Volunteer coordination and training, Day center activities, Sacred items museum, Community event hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, jQuery, MooTools
Frameworks
Joomla CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Joomla CMS with standard community support templates
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found
  3. Contact information includes physical address and contact form but no explicit emails or phone numbers
  4. Social media links to Facebook and Twitter are present
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  7. Website is HTTPS secured
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  9. Content is in Latvian language targeting local community
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS with Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons. JavaScript libraries include jQuery and MooTools, which are somewhat dated but still functional. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses standard CSS and JS files. Performance is moderate with no obvious heavy scripts or large media files. Mobile optimization is good with responsive grids and media queries. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with svgimenesmaja.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review svgimenesmaja.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.