Skip to main content

Security report for sv-schadenmanagement.de

Freie Sachverständigenbüro-Kooperation Sauerbrey GmbH + Peter Schulze · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Freie Sachverständigenbüro-Kooperation Sauerbrey GmbH + Peter Schulze is a well-established German company specializing in expert appraisals and assessments for vehicles and real estate. With over 35 years of experience, they serve clients primarily in Ulm and surrounding regions, offering services such as accident damage reports, oldtimer valuations, building damage assessments, and technical consulting. Their business model focuses on providing on-site expert evaluations for both private and commercial customers. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy presence with multiple physical locations and a free hotline for customer contact. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics with IP anonymization, and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though it appears to use a custom CMS. Performance is moderate with good user experience and navigation clarity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates privacy-compliant analytics and consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected, and WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy consistent with the business claims. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and good privacy compliance. Strategic enhancements in security policy transparency and technical security headers would further strengthen their security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sv-schadenmanagement.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sv-schadenmanagement.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sv-schadenmanagement.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong local market position as an essential service provider in transportation and real estate sectors, focusing on expert appraisals and damage assessments. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing experience, multiple regional offices, and comprehensive service offerings covering both vehicle and property domains. The business model is service-oriented with revenue streams likely from insurance companies, private clients, and commercial fleets. Target customers include vehicle owners, property owners, and insurers in the Ulm region. The partnership with Deitron Digitalagentur GmbH for digital presence indicates a strategic approach to marketing and customer engagement. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website with active consent management and analytics, suggesting ongoing investment in digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious analytics configurations. The use of Usercentrics for consent management aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The business impact of these gaps is moderate given the nature of the services and data handled. Enhancing security headers and publishing incident response contacts would improve readiness and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a stronger security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Freie Sachverständigenbüro-Kooperation Sauerbrey GmbH + Peter Schulze
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Freie Sachverständigenbüro-Kooperation Sauerbrey GmbH + Peter Schulze
Description
Unabhängige Kfz Sachverständige für Ulm, Neu-Ulm & Umgebung. Gutachten für Unfall-Schadengutachten & Wertgutachten. Jederzeit telefonisch erreichbar. Sachverständigen-Kooperation für KFZ und Bau mit Vor-Ort-Service in Ulm, Neu-Ulm, Senden, Biberach, Krumbach und Umgebung.
Key services
KFZ Unfall-Schadengutachten, Oldtimer Wertgutachten, Bauschadengutachten, Schimmelbewertung, Thermografie, Beweissicherung, Versicherungsgutachten, Beratung und technische Begleitung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Usercentrics Consent Management, jQuery, Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Consent management with Usercentrics
  • Ads data redaction enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and professionally presented.
  3. Clear contact information with multiple physical locations and hotline.
  4. Consent management implemented via Usercentrics.
  5. Use of Google Analytics with IP anonymization and Google Ads conversion tracking.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No email addresses explicitly found in HTML content.
  9. No social media links detected.
  10. Website uses custom CMS or framework with modern JS libraries.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS platform with integration of modern JavaScript libraries such as Modernizr and jQuery. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are implemented with privacy enhancements like IP anonymization. Usercentrics manages cookie consent in compliance with GDPR. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but domain and DNS configurations appear stable and consistent.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sv-schadenmanagement.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sv-schadenmanagement.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.