SMK · Non-profit · Netherlands
High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.
SMK is a Dutch non-profit foundation with over 30 years of experience dedicated to developing, managing, and testing sustainability criteria and certification schemes. The organization collaborates with a broad network including governments, producers, industry associations, NGOs, retailers, consultants, academia, and supply chain partners. Their key services include certification scheme development, compliance auditing, sustainability benchmarking, and communication support for sustainability programs. The website reflects a well-established entity with a clear mission and professional presentation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Google Maps API integration. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and a consistent branding approach. Performance is moderate, and accessibility is basic but functional. No major technical debts or outdated libraries were detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks advanced security headers and does not provide a public vulnerability disclosure or incident response policy. Privacy compliance is partial; while a privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant, there is no cookie consent mechanism visible. Contact information is available via a contact form but lacks direct emails or phone numbers. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's claims, showing a legitimate and transparent registration. Overall, SMK's website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic enhancements in security headers, cookie consent, and incident response disclosures would strengthen their security posture and user trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention sustainableflorist.eu, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for sustainableflorist.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with sustainableflorist.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sustainableflorist.eu.