Skip to main content

Security report for suri.cz

PFP s.r.o. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SURI.CZ is an independent Czech online platform specializing in car insurance comparison and brokerage services. Operated by PFP s.r.o., it offers users quick insurance comparisons, professional advisory services, and a mobile application to assist customers. The website targets Czech vehicle owners seeking optimal insurance solutions and partners with reputable insurance providers for legal protection, cycling, and golf insurance. The platform demonstrates a professional market position with clear branding and trust indicators such as a valid Czech National Bank license and active social media presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern analytics and marketing tools integrated, including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and PostHog. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is missing, which slightly reduces trustworthiness, but the business information and contact details are transparent and professional. Overall, the site is safe, well-maintained, and suitable for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching suri.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SURI.CZ operates in the transportation and finance sectors, focusing on insurance comparison services. Its business model revolves around providing an independent platform for users to compare and purchase car insurance and related products. The company leverages partnerships with insurance providers like DAS, BikePlan, and GolfPlan to offer specialized insurance products. The target customers are Czech vehicle owners and enthusiasts in cycling and golf. The platform's growth is supported by digital marketing and analytics tools, indicating a data-driven approach. The presence of a Czech National Bank license enhances credibility. The company appears small in size but maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence. The lack of WHOIS data suggests a need for monitoring domain registration status to avoid potential risks.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. It uses secure forms with input validation and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the analyzed content. The site lacks published security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, which are important for transparency and trust. Privacy and cookie policies are also missing, which may affect GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Monitor domain WHOIS registration status and ensure domain registration data is complete and consistent with business information.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PFP s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PFP s.r.o.
Description
Provozujeme online srovnávač autopojištění a mobilní aplikaci s péčí pro zákazníky.
Key services
Car insurance comparison, Legal protection insurance, Specialized insurance for cyclists and golfers, Mobile application for insurance management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, PostHog
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
Google Cloud Storage (for images and resources)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with input validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, PostHog
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, PostHog
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an independent car insurance comparison platform targeting Czech market.
  2. Content is professional, well-structured, and localized in Czech language.
  3. No WHOIS registration data available, possibly domain is unregistered or privacy protected at registry level.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page HTML.
  5. Multiple external trusted partners linked (insurance providers).
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with moderate tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  10. No visible security incident or vulnerability disclosure policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, and PostHog for analytics and marketing. It hosts static resources on Google Cloud Storage, indicating a scalable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing resource loading and caching. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The absence of security headers is a technical risk. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but has room for enhancements in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with suri.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review suri.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.