Skip to main content

Security report for supresencia.com

Iglesia Cristiana El Lugar de Su Presencia · Non-profit · Colombia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Iglesia Cristiana El Lugar de Su Presencia is a medium-sized non-profit religious organization based in Bogotá, Colombia. The website serves as the official digital presence for the church, providing information about services, community groups, children's ministry, radio broadcasting, and donation options. The target audience is primarily Spanish-speaking Christians in Colombia. The organization maintains a multimedia presence including live streaming and social media engagement, supported by several subsidiary domains related to radio, media production, and community outreach. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 with common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, hosted on AWS infrastructure. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and proper HTTPS configuration, which is a critical security shortfall. Privacy policies exist but lack comprehensive GDPR compliance and cookie consent mechanisms. Security headers are partially implemented but TLS protocols and modern security features are missing, exposing the site to potential risks. Overall, the website is functional and professionally presented but requires urgent improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching supresencia.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The church operates in the non-profit religious sector with a focus on community engagement and multimedia outreach. Its business model revolves around providing spiritual services, community connection groups, and media content, supported by donations. The organization leverages multiple digital channels including YouTube, social media, and radio to reach its audience. The presence of multiple related domains indicates a diversified digital ecosystem supporting different aspects of the ministry. The website's content and structure reflect a well-established local church with moderate digital maturity. However, the use of an outdated CMS and lack of HTTPS may hinder growth and user trust. Strategic partnerships appear limited to internal subsidiaries and related media brands. The church's market position is stable within its community but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security to expand its reach.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability. While some security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are present, the lack of TLS protocol support, HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption indicates poor security hygiene. No published security or incident response policies were found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files exist. The use of Drupal 7, an outdated CMS, may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not properly patched. Tracking scripts such as Google Tag Manager and CrazyEgg are used without visible cookie consent mechanisms, raising privacy compliance concerns. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation of SSL issues and enhancement of privacy and security policies to reduce risk and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site immediately.
  2. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  3. Upgrade server TLS protocols to support TLS 1.2 or higher and disable legacy protocols.
  4. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including user consent mechanisms.
  5. Migrate from Drupal 7 to a supported CMS version to mitigate security risks from outdated software.
  6. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency.
  7. Enhance incident response readiness by defining and publishing security contact channels.
  8. Review and optimize website performance and accessibility to improve user experience.
  9. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance.
  10. Strengthen trust signals by adding certifications, testimonials, or security badges.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 CMS with jQuery 2.1 and Bootstrap framework, supplemented by plugins such as Art Revolution Slider and Lightbox2. Hosting is on AWS infrastructure as indicated by DNS nameservers and IP addresses. The site uses chunked transfer encoding but lacks performance metrics, suggesting potential slowness. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA landmarks and skip links. The site includes Google Tag Manager and CrazyEgg for analytics and user behavior tracking. However, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical risk. The site also uses multiple subdomains for related services, indicating a modular infrastructure. Overall, the technical stack is functional but outdated and requires modernization to meet current security and performance standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with supresencia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review supresencia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.