Skip to main content

Security report for superoffice.com

Superoffice as · Computer software · Norway

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of superoffice.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching superoffice.com

This scan found 7 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
86

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SuperOffice operates in the technology sector as a SaaS CRM provider targeting businesses seeking customer relationship management solutions. The company maintains multiple country-specific domains indicating an international presence. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS with a focus on cloud delivery. The website content and integrations suggest a mature digital marketing and analytics approach. However, the lack of visible contact details and WHOIS data transparency could impact trust. The company benefits from partnerships with major cloud providers and uses advanced telemetry for performance and security monitoring. Growth indicators include multi-language support and extensive cookie compliance mechanisms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Microsoft Azure infrastructure, and telemetry via Application Insights. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed disclosures, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No visible incident response or security policy pages exist, limiting transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but can be improved by publishing security policies and enhancing header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
  2. Provide clear and accessible terms of service and privacy policy pages linked prominently on the website.
  3. Add visible contact information including company emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to improve domain transparency and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SuperOffice
Description
SuperOffice is a cloud-based CRM solution designed to help you build strong business relationships with your customers and turn them into revenue.
Key services
Cloud-based CRM software, Customer relationship management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Microsoft Azure, ASP.NET Core, Azure Application Insights, Cloudflare, Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Forms, Google Maps API
Frameworks
ASP.NET Core
Platforms
Cloud (Microsoft Azure)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Azure Application Insights for telemetry
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie info
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights, Google Analytics (via GTM), Crazy Egg, Microsoft Clarity, G2 Crowd
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW- IDs)
Tracking pixels
Crazy Egg, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics via GTM
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms, G2 Crowd tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie descriptions and third-party processors.
  3. No explicit privacy policy URL found in main HTML but linked via cookie consent to a third-party privacy policy provider.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page or in metadata.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and tracking services with consent management.
  7. WHOIS data missing, raising questions about domain registration transparency.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected, no error pages.
  9. Use of Microsoft Azure and Cloudflare as infrastructure providers.
  10. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100Low20 findingsView report
  2. 85/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with superoffice.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review superoffice.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

superoffice.com security report: 86/100, low risk | Guard