Skip to main content

Security report for sue-ryder.cz

Domov Sue Ryder, z.ú. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Domov Sue Ryder is a well-established Czech non-profit organization dedicated to providing social services to seniors and their families. Operating since 1998, it offers a range of services including personal assistance, senior homes, charity shops, and volunteer programs. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear branding, good content quality, and compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and the Nette Framework, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sue-ryder.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong position in the Czech senior care non-profit sector, leveraging a business model focused on social services and charitable fundraising. Its market presence is supported by a network of charity shops and active donor engagement platforms. The website's integration with social media and marketing tools indicates a strategic approach to outreach and community building. The absence of a terms of service page and explicit security policies suggests areas for operational maturity. The domain age and WHOIS data confirm the organization's legitimacy and long-term commitment to its mission.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS, cookie consent, and use of Google reCaptcha to protect forms. However, the lack of visible security headers and published security policies limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response mechanisms and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, which could be a gap in security readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the organization's risk profile but could be enhanced with formal documentation and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  3. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Domov Sue Ryder, z. ú.
VAT number
CZ26204673
Registration number
Oddíl U, vložka 213 (Městský soud v Praze)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domov Sue Ryder, z.ú.
Description
Sue Ryder is a non-governmental non-profit organization providing social services to seniors in the Czech Republic since 1998. They offer support, advice, and assistance to seniors and their families to ensure dignified aging.
Key services
Senior social services, Charity shops and restaurants, Donor and volunteer programs, Consulting and personal assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, jQuery, Nette Framework, Google Fonts, CookieConsent.js
Frameworks
Nette Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • Use of Google reCaptcha for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Seznam Sklik
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Seznam Sklik retargeting
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent requirements.
  3. Active social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  4. No visible security or privacy red flags.
  5. No terms of service page found, which could be improved.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Nette Framework and leverages common web technologies including jQuery, Google Fonts, and various JavaScript libraries for file upload and UI rendering. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Seznam Sklik retargeting. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing third-party scripts and assets. The cookie consent implementation is robust and multilingual, enhancing compliance and user experience. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sue-ryder.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sue-ryder.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.