Skip to main content

Security report for sudop.cz

SUDOP PRAHA a.s. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SUDOP PRAHA a.s. is a specialist company focused on transport infrastructure, providing engineering and consulting services primarily in the Czech Republic. The company targets professionals and organizations involved in transport infrastructure projects such as railways, bridges, and roads. The website reflects a professional presence with a consistent brand and good content quality, supporting their market position as an established player in the transportation sector. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Mapbox GL JS, and others. The site uses a CMS platform (Movisio) and demonstrates moderate performance with good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. No WHOIS data was found, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with good business credibility but could improve transparency and security practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sudop.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on infrastructure engineering and consultancy. Their business model revolves around providing specialized project design and management services. The website indicates a large-sized company with a strong presence in the Czech Republic. Social media integration and professional branding suggest active engagement with their audience. The lack of explicit contact details and WHOIS data limits full business intelligence but the site content and social links support legitimacy and market relevance.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but can be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program (e.g., security.txt) to facilitate responsible reporting and improve trust.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Improve SEO metadata completeness and structured data to boost search engine visibility and content discoverability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SUDOP PRAHA a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SUDOP PRAHA a.s.
Description
Specialist in transport infrastructure, offering services related to transport infrastructure projects including railways, bridges, and roads.
Key services
Transport infrastructure consultancy, Project design and management, Infrastructure development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Mapbox GL JS, Embla Carousel, Rellax
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or registry issue
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented in Czech language
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Spotify, Apple Podcasts
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in provided content
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  7. No terms of service page detected
  8. Modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools used
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript libraries such as Embla Carousel, Rellax, and Mapbox GL JS for interactive and mapping features. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are used for analytics and marketing. The CMS platform is Movisio, which supports modular content management. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and uses standard fonts from Google Fonts. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but security headers and accessibility could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sudop.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sudop.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.