Skip to main content

Security report for styrkja.is

Non-profit · Iceland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.styrkja.is serves as a donation platform focused on supporting a wide range of charitable and social causes within Iceland. It aggregates multiple non-profit organizations, providing users with the ability to make monthly contributions to causes such as child welfare, health, environment, and human rights. The platform positions itself as a trusted intermediary facilitating philanthropy in the Icelandic market. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including the Gatsby React framework, and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and CookieHub for cookie consent management. The website demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, contributing to a positive user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. WHOIS data for the domain is not publicly available, which is typical for Icelandic domains, but the site content and external references support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is professionally designed and trustworthy, with room for improvement in security transparency and privacy policy publication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching styrkja.is

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
62
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets individuals interested in supporting charitable causes in Iceland, offering a streamlined donation experience to multiple organizations. Its business model revolves around facilitating recurring donations, likely generating revenue through service fees or partnerships with the charities. The site features a broad ecosystem of partner organizations, enhancing its market position as a central hub for philanthropy in Iceland. The absence of detailed company registration or contact information suggests a focus on the platform as a service rather than a commercial enterprise. Growth potential lies in expanding partnerships and enhancing donor engagement through improved transparency and communication.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating compliance with GDPR cookie requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Implementing these elements would strengthen the security posture and build greater trust with users.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data handling and user rights.
  2. Add explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website promoting monthly donations to support various charitable and social causes in Iceland.
Key services
Monthly donation facilitation, Information about various charitable organizations, Donation management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Gatsby), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, CookieHub
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on supporting charitable causes in Iceland via monthly donations.
  3. No explicit privacy policy page found, but cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available for this domain, typical for .is domains.
  6. Uses modern web technologies including Gatsby React framework and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  7. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features observed.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Gatsby framework, leveraging React for a modern, performant frontend experience. It uses Google Tag Manager to manage analytics and marketing tags, including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user behavior tracking and retargeting. CookieHub is integrated for cookie consent management, supporting GDPR compliance. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features, with structured content and SEO-friendly meta tags. Performance appears moderate, with preloading of scripts and optimized images. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly found. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and publish additional compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with styrkja.is. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review styrkja.is.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.