Skip to main content

Security report for struktonwegenenbeton.nl

Strukton Wegen & Beton · Transportation · Netherlands

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Strukton Wegen & Beton is a Dutch infrastructure and civil engineering company focused on sustainable and future-proof infrastructure solutions. The company offers a broad range of services including road construction, concrete construction, energy networks, and specialized civil works. The website positions the company as an established player in the Dutch transportation and energy sectors, targeting business and public sector clients. The digital presence is built on a modern WordPress platform with good SEO and accessibility practices, supported by reputable hosting from LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, DNSSEC, and cookie consent mechanisms, though formal security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy business with a clear market focus.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching struktonwegenenbeton.nl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and energy infrastructure sectors, providing specialized construction and maintenance services. The business model revolves around project-based contracts with public and private clients, emphasizing sustainability and innovation. The website's integration with partner and parent company domains indicates a strong ecosystem and brand alignment. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via contact forms. The company appears to be newly launched or rebranded in 2024, consistent with the domain registration date. The presence of career and storytelling sections indicates active engagement with recruitment and brand building.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS, DNSSEC, and cookie consent management. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and trust. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could improve protection against common web attacks. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot is managed with consent but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with formal documentation and technical headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Strukton Wegen & Beton
Description
Strukton Wegen & Beton bouwt aan de infrastructuur van de toekomst. Voor de beste oplossing op maat zetten we onze kennis, kunde en capaciteit in.
Key services
Wegenbouw, Betonbouw, Energienetwerken, Kunstwerken, Leidingbouw, Industriebouw, Voegovergangen, Gladheidbestrijding, Kademuren en oeverwerken
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery, Slick Slider, WP Rocket, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent management
  • Google Tag Manager with consent mode

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and focused on infrastructure and civil engineering.
  3. Good use of SEO and structured data for enhanced search presence.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct company emails or phone numbers found on the homepage; contact is via contact form.
  6. Social media presence is established on LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
  10. Hosting and domain registration are legitimate and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with common plugins such as Yoast SEO, WP Rocket for caching, and Cookiebot for consent management. It uses jQuery and Slick Slider for interactive elements. Hosting is provided by LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V., a reputable provider with DNSSEC enabled for domain security. The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility features such as skip links and screen reader text are implemented. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience with fast loading times.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with struktonwegenenbeton.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review struktonwegenenbeton.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.